[Xenomai-core] -EINTR using rt_pipe_read with TM_INFINITE

Hi, I did this little test : Below I have attached two sources, one on the kernel side and one on the user side. I do here a very simple fifo handshaking test. I insert the kernel module then I run the user program. When I do the test with the THE BUG IS HERE line commented, I got : [EMAIL

[Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] -110 error on rt_task_send... bug?

So could anyone test this patch and let me know if it works? Note : I haven't compiled it even as I don't have a proper environment. But the changes are pretty simple so it should be ok. There was actually yet another problem mmm... who cares to delete a sender from the msendq? Now should be ok

[Xenomai-core] SMI update

I saw some bad latency behaviour on a new system, it is a P4 with ICH7 chipset. It showed more than 300 us max. latency without any load. This chipset was not detected as SMI generating and SMI disable was not done. Finally I figured out where to add this DEVICE_ID to the SMI detection in

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] -110 error on rt_task_send... bug?

On Wednesday 09 August 2006 13:42, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: So could anyone test this patch and let me know if it works? Note : I haven't compiled it even as I don't have a proper environment. But the changes are pretty simple so it should be ok. I just did run the test program supplied by

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] -110 error on rt_task_send... bug?

So could anyone test this patch and let me know if it works? Note : I haven't compiled it even as I don't have a proper environment. But the changes are pretty simple so it should be ok.I just did run the test program supplied by Vincent after applying Your patch(against 2.2.0)It did work !

RE : [Xenomai-core] -EINTR using rt_pipe_read with TM_INFINITE

Hello, I tested this with xenomai version V2.1.2 and V2.2 : same behavior. Regards, Jacques ___ Prof. Jacques GANGLOFF Strasbourg I University LSIIT Laboratory, EAVR team Bd S. Brant BP 10413, 67412 ILLKIRCH cedex, FRANCE Tel : +33

Re: [Xenomai-core] SMI update

Ulrich Schwab wrote: I saw some bad latency behaviour on a new system, it is a P4 with ICH7 chipset. It showed more than 300 us max. latency without any load. This chipset was not detected as SMI generating and SMI disable was not done. Finally I figured out where to add this DEVICE_ID

Re: [Xenomai-core] -EINTR using rt_pipe_read with TM_INFINITE

Jacques GANGLOFF wrote: Hi, I did this little test : Below I have attached two sources, one on the kernel side and one on the user side. I do here a very simple fifo handshaking test. I insert the kernel module then I run the user program. When I do the test with the THE BUG IS HERE