Hello Xenomai-core mailing list,
I'm eager to contribute to the Xenomai project, but since I could not
find any opened bugs or a detailed task list apart from:
http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/TaskMarket
I was wondering if there is way for newbies like me to get involved?
If any of you can
Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:
Hello Xenomai-core mailing list,
I'm eager to contribute to the Xenomai project, but since I could not
find any opened bugs or a detailed task list apart from:
http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/TaskMarket
I was wondering if there is way for newbies like me to
Thanks Jan,
I'm working on an academic course which I will teach next semester on
Real Time system, in which I will bring both VxWorks and Xenomai as Hard
RT systems as an example.
Therefore it will be only natural for me to work on porting some
examples to VxWorks skin at first.
My plan is to
Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:
Thanks Jan,
I'm working on an academic course which I will teach next semester on
Real Time system, in which I will bring both VxWorks and Xenomai as Hard
RT systems as an example.
Therefore it will be only natural for me to work on porting some
examples to
Hi,
it seems that in the RTDM API, all the timeout functions which use
nanosecs_rel_t have a strange behaviour.
The timeout in nanoseconds is converted to ticks and the number of ticks
is rounded down. So when we want to wait e.g. 50 nanoseconds and the
timertick is 1 ms, xnpod_ns2ticks()
Markus Osterried (BA/EDD) wrote:
Hi,
it seems that in the RTDM API, all the timeout functions which use
nanosecs_rel_t have a strange behaviour.
The timeout in nanoseconds is converted to ticks and the number of ticks
is rounded down. So when we want to wait e.g. 50 nanoseconds and the
On 8/29/07, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:32 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Markus Osterried (BA/EDD) wrote:
Hi,
it seems that in the RTDM API, all the timeout functions which use
nanosecs_rel_t have a strange behaviour.
The timeout in nanoseconds is
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:32 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Markus Osterried (BA/EDD) wrote:
Hi,
it seems that in the RTDM API, all the timeout functions which use
nanosecs_rel_t have a strange behaviour.
The timeout in nanoseconds is converted to ticks and the number of ticks
is rounded
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 16:32 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Markus Osterried (BA/EDD) wrote:
Hi,
it seems that in the RTDM API, all the timeout functions which use
nanosecs_rel_t have a strange behaviour.
The timeout in nanoseconds is converted to ticks and the number of
