Re: [Xenomai-core] [Adeos-main] I-pipe for 2.6.32 PPC

2010-02-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 08:53 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: Philippe, After updating my ipipe git repo, I notice that you have done something new with ipipe-2.6.32-powerpc, back in January. Previously, the Denx bits appeared as squashed commits. Now, the Denx commits appear individually.

Re: [Xenomai-core] [Adeos-main] I-pipe for 2.6.32 PPC

2010-02-23 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:07:57AM +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: With ipipe-2.6.33 solely tracking mainline, only the few temporary trees with not-mainlined-yet features/support will pull from the DENX tree to get them. Okay, its now clear to me. Thanks for the explanation. Richard

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-23 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum: snip In the future, maybe we could simply provide a wrapper script accepting sub-commands, such as xeno latency, xeno sigtest etc, to be put into /usr/bin by distros, which would hide the actual location of those binaries? In any case,

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:52 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: Hi, Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum: snip In the future, maybe we could simply provide a wrapper script accepting sub-commands, such as xeno latency, xeno sigtest etc, to be put into /usr/bin by distros, which