Hi Philipe,
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 12:36 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>
>>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
It looks like this patch is still pending an ack/nak. Wolfgang, any
comment on this? TIA,
>>> FIFO overrun, sorry
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 12:36 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> > Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >> It looks like this patch is still pending an ack/nak. Wolfgang, any
> >> comment on this? TIA,
> >
> > FIFO overrun, sorry.
> >
> >> On Tue, 2009-05-05 a
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> It looks like this patch is still pending an ack/nak. Wolfgang, any
>> comment on this? TIA,
>
> FIFO overrun, sorry.
>
>> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:04 +0200, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> my pci board has the same
Hi Philippe,
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> It looks like this patch is still pending an ack/nak. Wolfgang, any
> comment on this? TIA,
FIFO overrun, sorry.
> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:04 +0200, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> my pci board has the same pci-interface-chip as the IXXAT-PCI board.
>>
It looks like this patch is still pending an ack/nak. Wolfgang, any
comment on this? TIA,
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:04 +0200, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my pci board has the same pci-interface-chip as the IXXAT-PCI board.
> The vendor and device id's are identical, but the subsys id is di
