Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-31 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: To achieve this, 1) xnintr_t should be extended with a "name" field; 2) rt_intr_create() should contain a "name" argument and not use auto-generation (as "irqN") any more. Ok, sounds reasonable. This said, since this change would alter the inte

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-31 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: To achieve this, 1) xnintr_t should be extended with a "name" field; 2) rt_intr_create() should contain a "name" argument and not use auto-generation (as "irqN") any more. Ok, sounds reasonable. This said, since this change would alter the inte

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > On 23/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dmitry Adamushko wrote: >>> Hello Jan, >>> >>> as I promised earlier today, here is the patch. >> I finally had a look at your patch (not yet a try), and it looks really >> nice and light-weight. > > > I have another

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-23 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 23/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote:> Hello Jan,>> as I promised earlier today, here is the patch.I finally had a look at your patch (not yet a try), and it looks reallynice and light-weight. I have another version here at hand. The only difference is that  xn

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > On 23/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dmitry Adamushko wrote: >>> Hello Jan, >>> >>> as I promised earlier today, here is the patch. >> I finally had a look at your patch (not yet a try), and it looks really >> nice and light-weight. > > > I have another

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-23 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 23/01/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote:> Hello Jan,>> as I promised earlier today, here is the patch.I finally had a look at your patch (not yet a try), and it looks reallynice and light-weight. I have another version here at hand. The only difference is that  xn

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > Hello Jan, > > as I promised earlier today, here is the patch. I finally had a look at your patch (not yet a try), and it looks really nice and light-weight. Now I only have two topics on my wish list: o Handling of edge-triggered IRQs (ISA-cards...). As I tried to expl

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared irqs v.5

2006-01-22 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > Hello Jan, > > as I promised earlier today, here is the patch. I finally had a look at your patch (not yet a try), and it looks really nice and light-weight. Now I only have two topics on my wish list: o Handling of edge-triggered IRQs (ISA-cards...). As I tried to expl