Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:12:36 +0200
From: gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org
To: gm...@reliableembeddedsystems.com
CC: xenomai-core@gna.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Tiny Core Linux + xenomai/RTAI
Robert Berger wrote:
Hi Gilles,
On 04/05/2011
Has anyone tried applying Xenomai or RTAI patch to the tiny core Linux? Will it
give a better performance compared to the plain vanilla Linux because the
kernel footprint is small? ___
Xenomai-core mailing list
krishna m wrote:
Has anyone tried applying Xenomai or RTAI patch to the tiny core
Linux? Will it give a better performance compared to the plain
vanilla Linux because the kernel footprint is small?
Let us make this clear, since apparently people still seem to wonder:
Xenomai only relies on the
Hi Krishna,
On 04/05/2011 04:48 PM, krishna m wrote:
Has anyone tried applying Xenomai or RTAI patch to the tiny core Linux?
No
Will it give a better performance compared to the plain vanilla Linux
because the kernel footprint is small?
I guess the Linux Kernel is pretty much the same with
Robert Berger wrote:
Hi Krishna,
On 04/05/2011 04:48 PM, krishna m wrote:
Has anyone tried applying Xenomai or RTAI patch to the tiny core Linux?
No
Will it give a better performance compared to the plain vanilla Linux
because the kernel footprint is small?
I guess the Linux Kernel
Hi Gilles,
On 04/05/2011 08:17 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Ok, we are on Xenomai-core, so, let us discuss. If we admit that the OP
is indeed talking about latencies (a quantifiable measure of
determinism), suggesting that the effect on cache of the Linux kernel
might influence the
Robert Berger wrote:
Hi Gilles,
On 04/05/2011 08:17 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Ok, we are on Xenomai-core, so, let us discuss. If we admit that the OP
is indeed talking about latencies (a quantifiable measure of
determinism), suggesting that the effect on cache of the Linux kernel
