Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-22 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: >> For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only >> HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any >> additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no >> clean usage policy for them. > > Good. Then let's go

[Xenomai-core] Xenomai patch packaging concerns

2006-02-22 Thread Romain Lenglet
Hi, I understand that the prepare-kernel.sh script is a kind of "smart patch" program. It is very nice, but for packaging for Debian we need a real diff file. So I am currently modifying prepare-kernel.sh to be even smarter, so that it can optionally generate a diff file instead of actually m

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-22 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: >> For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only >> HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any >> additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no >> clean usage policy for them. > > Good. Then let's go

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-22 Thread Anders Blomdell
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only > HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any > additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no > clean usage policy for them. Good. Then let's go f

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-22 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
> For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only > HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any > additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no > clean usage policy for them. Good. Then let's go for HANDLED, UNHANDLED - we m

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-22 Thread Anders Blomdell
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only > HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any > additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no > clean usage policy for them. Good. Then let's go f

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-22 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
> For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only > HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any > additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no > clean usage policy for them. Good. Then let's go for HANDLED, UNHANDLED - we m