We at
Xerox El Segundo, Calif are new user of VxWork Skin of Xenomai. We
successfully brought up VxWork skin of xenomai 2.0.1on x86 platform and ran
VxWork test program in C.
The
question we have is how to build and compile the VxWork skin of xenomai to
support C++ code?
___
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have explicitly cc'ed Gilles as this patch affects the posix skin.
>
> In the light of the recent discussions, the AUTOENA flag has been converted
> to NOAUTOENA and the IRQ line is re-enabled on return from
> xnintr_irq_handler() and shirq brothers by de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Gilles,
>
> perhaps I should have mentioned in my earlier postings that I am using a
> PowerPC platform. I hope this does not nullify your prior analyses.
Everything works fine here with the config files you sent me, so I guess
the issue is specific to the ppc
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > the last check-in seems to have messed something up:
> > > >
> > > > .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near
> > > > unexpect
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the last check-in seems to have messed something up:
> > >
> > > .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near
> > > unexpected token `fi'
> > >
> > > I do not unders
Hi there,
I have explicitly cc'ed Gilles as this patch affects the posix skin.
In the light of the recent discussions, the AUTOENA flag has been
converted to NOAUTOENA and the IRQ line is re-enabled on return from
xnintr_irq_handler() and shirq brothers by default.
Also XN_ISR_CHAINED -> XN_ISR_
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the last check-in seems to have messed something up:
> >
> > .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near
> > unexpected token `fi'
> >
> > I do not understand what's going on here, so I don't want to ha
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>
>>> I noticed you fixed the libtool warning during xenomai build - by
>>> linking the testsuite statically... :-/ This is just a workaround and
>>> doesn't help external users.
>> Yes, it's clearly hacky-patchy, how
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the last check-in seems to have messed something up:
>
> .../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near
> unexpected token `fi'
>
> I do not understand what's going on here, so I don't want to hack some
> probably wrong fix for this.
In or
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Romain Lenglet wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Romain Lenglet wrote:
> +while read f; do
> +f=`echo $f | cut -d/ -f2-`
> +d=`dirname $f`
> +if test "x$output_patch" = "x"; then
> +mkdir -p $linux_tree/$link_d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for caring about my problem !
Perhaps I should have mentioned in my earlier postings that I am using a
PowerPC platform. I hope this does not nullify your prior analyses.
These are the outputs (with some of my debug outputs), when I start satch.
# ./satch
Xen
Hi,
the last check-in seems to have messed something up:
.../xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh: line 61: syntax error near
unexpected token `fi'
I do not understand what's going on here, so I don't want to hack some
probably wrong fix for this.
Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Dear Gilles,
perhaps I should have mentioned in my earlier postings that I am using a
PowerPC platform. I hope this does not nullify your prior analyses.
As the following output shows, my timer is running in onshot mode :
~ # cat /proc/xenomai/timer
status=oneshot:setup=40:tickval=1:jiffies=9405
Thank you for caring about my problem !
Perhaps I should have mentioned in my earlier postings that I am using a
PowerPC platform. I hope this does not nullify your prior analyses.
These are the outputs (with some of my debug outputs), when I start satch.
# ./satch
Xenomai: UVM skin or CONFIG_XE
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
...
This said, I'm going to publish the shirq patch (after finalizing ISR
return
bits,
where I still have some doubts) without enable/disable nesting
support.
It can be supported at
Romain Lenglet wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Romain Lenglet wrote:
> +while read f; do
> +f=`echo $f | cut -d/ -f2-`
> +d=`dirname $f`
> +if test "x$output_patch" = "x"; then
> +mkdir -p $linux_tree/$link_dir/$d && \
> +
Anders Blomdell wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> ...
> This said, I'm going to publish the shirq patch (after finalizing ISR
> return
> bits,
> where I still have some doubts) without enable
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
...
This said, I'm going to publish the shirq patch (after finalizing ISR
return
bits,
where I still have some doubts) without enable/disable nesting support.
It can be supported at some point of time later,
18 matches
Mail list logo
