Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [BUG] timerbench tests don't work with SVN

2007-01-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 16:16 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 15:52 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Hi Philippe, > > > > likely a regression of latest timer base patches: with periodic support > > enabled (haven't tested the off case yet), latency -t1/2 no longer work. > > I have n

[Xenomai-core] Re: [BUG] timerbench tests don't work with SVN

2007-01-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 15:52 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > likely a regression of latest timer base patches: with periodic support > enabled (haven't tested the off case yet), latency -t1/2 no longer work. > I have no time to look at this, so I just dump my report here. :) > Btw, it

[Xenomai-core] Re: [BUG] timerbench tests don't work with SVN

2007-01-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 15:52 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > likely a regression of latest timer base patches: with periodic support > enabled (haven't tested the off case yet), latency -t1/2 no longer work. > I have no time to look at this, so I just dump my report here. :) > > Jan >

[Xenomai-core] [BUG] timerbench tests don't work with SVN

2007-01-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, likely a regression of latest timer base patches: with periodic support enabled (haven't tested the off case yet), latency -t1/2 no longer work. I have no time to look at this, so I just dump my report here. :) Jan PS: Is there an official nucleus API to convert dates between timeb

Re: [Xenomai-core] Support for 2.6.19

2007-01-04 Thread Detlef Vollmann
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > I guess the reason is that it is some work that needs to be done. I had > ported from 2.6.15 to 2.6.17, Interesting. Is that patch available somewhere? > it was a trivial task as far as I could > see, but never tried to port to 2.6.19. There were some architectural >

Re: [Xenomai-core] Support for 2.6.19

2007-01-04 Thread Sebastian Smolorz
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Detlef Vollmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the x86 branch supports kernel 2.6.19, but the ARM branch only supports > > 2.6.15. Is there a specific reason for this? > > Does anybody have a feeling what would be needed to be changed > > for 2.6.19 support? > > I guess th

Re: [Xenomai-core] Support for 2.6.19

2007-01-04 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Detlef Vollmann wrote: > Hello, > > the x86 branch supports kernel 2.6.19, but the ARM branch only supports > 2.6.15. Is there a specific reason for this? > Does anybody have a feeling what would be needed to be changed > for 2.6.19 support? I guess the reason is that it is some work that needs