Hi Dmitry,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi everybody,
the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are
supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding
support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the
irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the i
Hi Dmitry,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi everybody,
the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are
supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding
support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the
irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the i
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are
> supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding
> support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the
> irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the irq
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are
> supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding
> support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the
> irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the irq
Hi everybody,
the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are
supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding
support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the
irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the irq processing
chain has become shorter
Hi everybody,
the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are
supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding
support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the
irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the irq processing
chain has become shorter