Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> I guess the reason is that it is some work that needs to be done. I had
> ported from 2.6.15 to 2.6.17,
Interesting.
Is that patch available somewhere?
> it was a trivial task as far as I could
> see, but never tried to port to 2.6.19. There were some architectural
>
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the x86 branch supports kernel 2.6.19, but the ARM branch only supports
> > 2.6.15. Is there a specific reason for this?
> > Does anybody have a feeling what would be needed to be changed
> > for 2.6.19 support?
>
> I guess th
Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the x86 branch supports kernel 2.6.19, but the ARM branch only supports
> 2.6.15. Is there a specific reason for this?
> Does anybody have a feeling what would be needed to be changed
> for 2.6.19 support?
I guess the reason is that it is some work that needs
Hello,
the x86 branch supports kernel 2.6.19, but the ARM branch only supports
2.6.15. Is there a specific reason for this?
Does anybody have a feeling what would be needed to be changed
for 2.6.19 support?
Best
Detlef
--
Detlef Vollmann vollmann engineering gmbh
Linux and C++ for Embedded
