Re: [Xenomai-core] VxWorks skin is missing new VxWorks headers for RTP

2007-09-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 00:04 +0300, Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:
 I imagined thats the policy.
 
 But is it worth investing time in? or is there higher priority task I
 can be assigned to?
 

I don't think RTP is high priority for now.

Two other tasks would have a much more significant impact, both for
Xenomai users and developers.

1) Make Valgrind usable with Xenomai apps; of course without any
real-time guarantee anymore, but this would nevertheless plug a serious
hole in the development toolset available to users.

2) We do, certainly, definitely, desperately miss an automated way to
get performance charts for a few selected Xenomai tests, which would
allows us to conduct comparative analysis between versions, and find out
what's right or wrong with our changes.

For instance, we are currently maintaining seven architecture ports;
each time something changes in some part of Xenomai's generic code, we
have no freaking idea whether all archs benefit from such change, or if
at least no arch gets penalized by it. And the very same goes for the
interrupt pipeline, for which any hazardous change may generate adverse
effects on an even much larger scale. Let me put this bluntly: this
won't fly much longer; we are losing precious time getting rid of any
regression way after it has actually happened into the code, because we
cannot easily and routinely COMPARE how different versions behave. Aside
of this, we don't have any factual data regarding how Xenomai evolved
over time in terms of latency, code footprints and so on.

What we need is a simple automated way to a given test on any given
Xenomai version (actually a SVN commit number would be much better)
extracted from our repository, draw a few charts summing up the results,
and move those results to our website periodically or even as soon as
they are available. _This_ would help users to understand the current
trend and why we did some changes (or why we should not have done them),
and allow developers to pull the brake each time a serious regression is
visible from those charts.

Simple and easy:

TEST/x86: interrupt latency to kernel handler [latency -t2]

(latency in us)
^
|x (XX us) = Houston, we have a 
problem.
|  x (ZZ us)
|  
| x (YY us)
|   
+---
commit#72  ...commit#2004  commit#any
 (v2.0)  (v2.3)

Another test could analyse the task dispatch latency, another one the
code footprints in kernel space, and so on. Once this framework is
available, we would find the various hardware to run the tests on and
get the results from, that is not an issue anymore.

Besides, tackling this issue is quite a good way to have his feet wet
almost immediately with the Xenomai framework as a power user, and also
to get immediate reward for such work, since we would push its results
online routinely.

Please, somebody implement this, damnit! Or I'm going to rewrite the
entire Xenomai stack in Bourne shell with Java applets for speedups, so
you could not complain about bad latencies and unwanted overhead
anymore.

Thank you,

  
 
 
 Philippe Gerum wrote:
 
  On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 17:05 +0300, Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:

  Hello again,
 
 
  Preface:
 
  As of VxWorks 6.x vxworks implement RTP which is an implementation of
  user space processes with real time capabilities, which of course
  include an extended API, which from my testings I discovered that we do
  not support yet.
 
 
  Currently extending the VxWorks API is not in Xenomai task list, does it
  have any demand?
 
  If I'll take it as a my task, do we have any legal issues with using
  Wind River's headers?
  
 
  This matter is muddy; fair use, interoperability, and copyrights of
  header files and/or their contents is a legal mess.
 
  Our policy is simple: paste-copy of any portion of any proprietary
  licensed header is unwanted and will be systematically rejected. You
  need to implement your own header, defining what you need for satisfying
  all the references within the emulator your are writing from scratch.
 
  You should also explicitly mention in the copyright notice that the
  resulting software is an emulator. We claim to mimick the original
  software as correctly as possible, according to the API specs which have
  been made publically available by the copyright holder of the original
  work, with all the limitations inherent to such exercise. In any case,
  we don't claim to produce a copy of the original software we only
  emulate. In short, Xenomai is a Chameleon, not a clone.
 

  If any of my assumptions is false or if you have any comment/answers
  please reply.
 
 
  thanks
 
  Ravid
 
  
 
 
-- 
Philippe.



___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] VxWorks skin is missing new VxWorks headers for RTP

2007-09-04 Thread Ravid Baruch Naali
The automated chart seems exactly the thing for me (I have some testing
tools development experience).

I'll look into it and will soon send a initial design.


Of course any pinters/advice/suggestions will be highly appreciated.


Philippe Gerum wrote:

 On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 00:04 +0300, Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:
   
 I imagined thats the policy.

 But is it worth investing time in? or is there higher priority task I
 can be assigned to?

 

 I don't think RTP is high priority for now.

 Two other tasks would have a much more significant impact, both for
 Xenomai users and developers.

 1) Make Valgrind usable with Xenomai apps; of course without any
 real-time guarantee anymore, but this would nevertheless plug a serious
 hole in the development toolset available to users.

 2) We do, certainly, definitely, desperately miss an automated way to
 get performance charts for a few selected Xenomai tests, which would
 allows us to conduct comparative analysis between versions, and find out
 what's right or wrong with our changes.

 For instance, we are currently maintaining seven architecture ports;
 each time something changes in some part of Xenomai's generic code, we
 have no freaking idea whether all archs benefit from such change, or if
 at least no arch gets penalized by it. And the very same goes for the
 interrupt pipeline, for which any hazardous change may generate adverse
 effects on an even much larger scale. Let me put this bluntly: this
 won't fly much longer; we are losing precious time getting rid of any
 regression way after it has actually happened into the code, because we
 cannot easily and routinely COMPARE how different versions behave. Aside
 of this, we don't have any factual data regarding how Xenomai evolved
 over time in terms of latency, code footprints and so on.

 What we need is a simple automated way to a given test on any given
 Xenomai version (actually a SVN commit number would be much better)
 extracted from our repository, draw a few charts summing up the results,
 and move those results to our website periodically or even as soon as
 they are available. _This_ would help users to understand the current
 trend and why we did some changes (or why we should not have done them),
 and allow developers to pull the brake each time a serious regression is
 visible from those charts.

 Simple and easy:

 TEST/x86: interrupt latency to kernel handler [latency -t2]

 (latency in us)
 ^
 |x (XX us) = Houston, we have a 
 problem.
 |  x (ZZ us)
 |  
 | x (YY us)
 |   
 +---
 commit#72  ...commit#2004  commit#any
  (v2.0)  (v2.3)

 Another test could analyse the task dispatch latency, another one the
 code footprints in kernel space, and so on. Once this framework is
 available, we would find the various hardware to run the tests on and
 get the results from, that is not an issue anymore.

 Besides, tackling this issue is quite a good way to have his feet wet
 almost immediately with the Xenomai framework as a power user, and also
 to get immediate reward for such work, since we would push its results
 online routinely.

 Please, somebody implement this, damnit! Or I'm going to rewrite the
 entire Xenomai stack in Bourne shell with Java applets for speedups, so
 you could not complain about bad latencies and unwanted overhead
 anymore.

 Thank you,

   
  


 Philippe Gerum wrote:

 
 On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 17:05 +0300, Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:
   
   
 Hello again,


 Preface:

 As of VxWorks 6.x vxworks implement RTP which is an implementation of
 user space processes with real time capabilities, which of course
 include an extended API, which from my testings I discovered that we do
 not support yet.


 Currently extending the VxWorks API is not in Xenomai task list, does it
 have any demand?

 If I'll take it as a my task, do we have any legal issues with using
 Wind River's headers?
 
 
 This matter is muddy; fair use, interoperability, and copyrights of
 header files and/or their contents is a legal mess.

 Our policy is simple: paste-copy of any portion of any proprietary
 licensed header is unwanted and will be systematically rejected. You
 need to implement your own header, defining what you need for satisfying
 all the references within the emulator your are writing from scratch.

 You should also explicitly mention in the copyright notice that the
 resulting software is an emulator. We claim to mimick the original
 software as correctly as possible, according to the API specs which have
 been made publically available by the copyright holder of the original
 work, with all the limitations inherent to such exercise. In any case,
 we don't claim to produce a copy of the original software we only
 emulate. In short, Xenomai is a Chameleon, not a clone.

Re: [Xenomai-core] VxWorks skin is missing new VxWorks headers for RTP

2007-09-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:
 The automated chart seems exactly the thing for me (I have some testing
 tools development experience).
 
 I'll look into it and will soon send a initial design.

Hurray! You just deserved an option for a free beer! Now you just need
to post the first related patch - and manage to meet me personally (the
latter may be a bit trickier than the former ;)).

 
 Of course any pinters/advice/suggestions will be highly appreciated.

Let's start with creating the infrastructure for the targets firsts.
Once we have more tests with unified output locally on the Xenomai
targets, we can think about how to transfer this data to a central
database and how to visualise that database on the web.

Jan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] VxWorks skin is missing new VxWorks headers for RTP

2007-09-03 Thread Ravid Baruch Naali
Hello again,


Preface:

As of VxWorks 6.x vxworks implement RTP which is an implementation of
user space processes with real time capabilities, which of course
include an extended API, which from my testings I discovered that we do
not support yet.


Currently extending the VxWorks API is not in Xenomai task list, does it
have any demand?

If I'll take it as a my task, do we have any legal issues with using
Wind River's headers?


If any of my assumptions is false or if you have any comment/answers
please reply.


thanks

Ravid

-- 
Ravid Baruch Naali
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972 4 6732729
+972 52 5830021


___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] VxWorks skin is missing new VxWorks headers for RTP

2007-09-03 Thread Ravid Baruch Naali
I imagined thats the policy.

But is it worth investing time in? or is there higher priority task I
can be assigned to?

 


Philippe Gerum wrote:

 On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 17:05 +0300, Ravid Baruch Naali wrote:
   
 Hello again,


 Preface:

 As of VxWorks 6.x vxworks implement RTP which is an implementation of
 user space processes with real time capabilities, which of course
 include an extended API, which from my testings I discovered that we do
 not support yet.


 Currently extending the VxWorks API is not in Xenomai task list, does it
 have any demand?

 If I'll take it as a my task, do we have any legal issues with using
 Wind River's headers?
 

 This matter is muddy; fair use, interoperability, and copyrights of
 header files and/or their contents is a legal mess.

 Our policy is simple: paste-copy of any portion of any proprietary
 licensed header is unwanted and will be systematically rejected. You
 need to implement your own header, defining what you need for satisfying
 all the references within the emulator your are writing from scratch.

 You should also explicitly mention in the copyright notice that the
 resulting software is an emulator. We claim to mimick the original
 software as correctly as possible, according to the API specs which have
 been made publically available by the copyright holder of the original
 work, with all the limitations inherent to such exercise. In any case,
 we don't claim to produce a copy of the original software we only
 emulate. In short, Xenomai is a Chameleon, not a clone.

   
 If any of my assumptions is false or if you have any comment/answers
 please reply.


 thanks

 Ravid

 


-- 
Ravid Baruch Naali
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972 4 6732729
+972 52 5830021


___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core