Hello,
I just checked out Xenomai and realized the UVM build error below (while
building for PPC 405 with IPIPE tracer). "xnlock_put/get" seems not to
be dummy without SMP.
Wolfgang.
if ppc-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src/include -O2
-D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D__XEN
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just checked out Xenomai and realized the UVM build error below (while
> building for PPC 405 with IPIPE tracer). "xnlock_put/get" seems not to
> be dummy without SMP.
>
> Wolfgang.
>
Try this patch. It fixes the problem and also appears to me as the
c
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
I just checked out Xenomai and realized the UVM build error below (while
building for PPC 405 with IPIPE tracer). "xnlock_put/get" seems not to
be dummy without SMP.
Wolfgang.
Try this patch. It fixes the problem and also appears to me
Romain Lenglet wrote:
BUGS
-N name is timestamped, giving uniqueness. This is a
caveat, not a bug
No, it is a feature. I added it into the documentation of -L
and -N.
By the way, I suggest that you use a timestamp in the RFC 3339
format (a subset of ISO 8601):
date "+%Y-%m-%d %H:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
As promised, the I-pipe tracer has been ported to ppc. People working on
this architecture are invited to give it a try, it's a great tool to
find out where the cycles are actually going.
Just apply the tracer patch on top of the Adeos patch bearing the same
revision n
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>
>> As promised, the I-pipe tracer has been ported to ppc. People working
>> on this architecture are invited to give it a try, it's a great tool
>> to find out where the cycles are actually going.
>>
>> Just apply the tracer patch on top of the
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
As promised, the I-pipe tracer has been ported to ppc. People working
on this architecture are invited to give it a try, it's a great tool
to find out where the cycles are actually going.
Just apply the tracer patch on top of t
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> ...
>> This trace covers some long stall of the root domain, not the maximum
>> stall of the Xenomai domain that caused the 140 us above. See the
>> explanation for the stall bits above.
>
> Ah, some feed for the real
Jim Cromie wrote:
> > By the way, I suggest that you use a timestamp in the RFC
> > 3339 format (a subset of ISO 8601):
> > date "+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S%:z"
> > or, assuming date is GNU date:
> > date --rfc-3339=seconds
>
> I wanted a compact rep.
> is there a std format that doesnt have a space ?
> it
