Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] oops on skincall without nucleus being loaded

2006-06-27 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > misinterpretation. When issuing syscalls with a fixed muxid whereas > > there is no interface corresponding to this muxid, the nucleus crashes, > > but it is acceptable, user-space interfaces should issue an > > __xn_sys_bind syscall

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] oops on skincall without nucleus being loaded

2006-06-27 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > > misinterpretation. When issuing syscalls with a fixed muxid whereas > > > there is no interface corresponding to this muxid, the nucleus crashes, > > > but it is acceptable, user-space interfaces should is

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 6/6] Introduce IRQ latency benchmark

2006-06-27 Thread Jan Kiszka
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This patch introduces another rttesting driver, xeno_irqbench, for > measuring external IRQ latencies. The irqbench device is controlled > by a user-mode tool irqloop. A second tool for plain Linux, irqbench, > is provided to trigger the event over serial or parallel cros

[Xenomai-core] Prio-inversion on cleanup?

2006-06-27 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, could someone give this scenario a try (requires my recent patch series) and tell me if you are also seeing excessive latencies: Start: irqloop (+xeno_irqbench) -P 99 -t 0 latency -p 200 -P 50 Terminate: irqloop The termination seems to cause high latencies to the (then highest-prio) period