Hi Gilles,
I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
(only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
frequent excessive latencies) I get a stalled Linux timer IRQ quite
quickly. System is otherwise still responsive, Xenomai timers are still
being de
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
> (only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
> frequent excessive latencies) I get a stalled Linux timer IRQ quite
> quickly. System is otherwise still responsive, Xen
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:04 +0200, Steven Kauffmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I connect a debugger to my application, other Xenomai periodic
> threads (threads that not belong to the current process I'm debugging
> ) are not scheduled anymore. Attached you can find a simple example
> that reproduces
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:04 +0200, Steven Kauffmann wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If I connect a debugger to my application, other Xenomai periodic
>> threads (threads that not belong to the current process I'm debugging
>> ) are not scheduled anymore. Attached you can find a simp
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
>> (only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
>> frequent excessive latencies) I get a stalled Linux timer IRQ quite
>> quickly. System
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Hi Gilles,
> >>
> >> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
> >> (only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
> >> frequent excessive
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:16 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:04 +0200, Steven Kauffmann wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> If I connect a debugger to my application, other Xenomai periodic
> >> threads (threads that not belong to the current process
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:16 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:04 +0200, Steven Kauffmann wrote:
Hi all,
If I connect a debugger to my application, other Xenomai periodic
threads (threads that not belo
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:34 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:16 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:04 +0200, Steven Kauffmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I connect a debugger
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
>>> (only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
>>> frequent excessive latencies) I get a stalled Linux timer IR
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Gilles,
I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
(only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Gilles,
I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
(only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
frequent excessive late
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 17:28 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
> >
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 17:28 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
> (only tested this so far): running it
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
>>
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>...
> Martin, could you check if this helps you, too?
It doesn't appear to help. To check, first I turned on the HPET and PM
timer options, and recompiled the kernel without your patch, to verify
that this reproduced the problem. I then manually applied you
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:10 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 17:28 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 15:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Hi Gilles
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I'm currently facing a nasty effect with switchtest over latest git head
> (only tested this so far): running it inside my test VM (ie. with
>
19 matches
Mail list logo