Hello
I made a patch in order to support the Atmel AT91SAM9G20 processor,
which has to be applied after the "adeos-ipipe-2.6.27-arm-*" patch.
Due to the similarities between the AT91SAM9260 and the AT91SAM9G20
processor, only a few changes were necessary. I booted the system on a
"AT91SAM9G20-EK"
martin mangard wrote:
> Hello
>
> I made a patch in order to support the Atmel AT91SAM9G20 processor,
> which has to be applied after the "adeos-ipipe-2.6.27-arm-*" patch.
> Due to the similarities between the AT91SAM9260 and the AT91SAM9G20
> processor, only a few changes were necessary. I booted
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> martin mangard wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I made a patch in order to support the Atmel AT91SAM9G20 processor,
>> which has to be applied after the "adeos-ipipe-2.6.27-arm-*" patch.
>> Due to the similarities between the AT91SAM9260 and the AT91SAM9G20
>> processor, only a f
Hello
You are right! This part of the patch is not necessary and is ignored
if the AT91SAM9G20 is selected in the kernel configuration. I made
this change during a test with another kernel configuration. Sadly
this change was still present during the creation of the patch. The
attached patch doe
martin mangard wrote:
> Hello
>
> You are right! This part of the patch is not necessary and is ignored
> if the AT91SAM9G20 is selected in the kernel configuration. I made
> this change during a test with another kernel configuration. Sadly
> this change was still present during the creation of
