The code structures on x86 were broken as the compiler aligned the
internal layout. The same may have happened on blackfin. Fix it by
applying a packed tag on the enclosing structures.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
Haven't checked Xenomai 3 yet, it may be affected as well.
include/asm-blackfin
We had two regressions in this code recently. So test all 6 possible
SIGDEBUG reasons, or 5 if the watchdog is not available.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
src/testsuite/unit/Makefile.am | 16 +++-
src/testsuite/unit/sigdebug.c | 233
2 files changed,
On 01/25/2012 05:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> We had two regressions in this code recently. So test all 6 possible
> SIGDEBUG reasons, or 5 if the watchdog is not available.
Ok for this test, with a few remarks:
- this is a regression test, so should go to
src/testsuite/regression(/native), and shou
On 2012-01-25 17:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 05:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> We had two regressions in this code recently. So test all 6 possible
>> SIGDEBUG reasons, or 5 if the watchdog is not available.
>
> Ok for this test, with a few remarks:
> - this is a regression test,
On 2012-01-25 17:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 17:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 05:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> We had two regressions in this code recently. So test all 6 possible
>>> SIGDEBUG reasons, or 5 if the watchdog is not available.
>>
>> Ok for this test, with a
On 01/25/2012 05:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 17:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-25 17:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 01/25/2012 05:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
We had two regressions in this code recently. So test all 6 possible
SIGDEBUG reasons, or 5 if the watchdog
On 2012-01-25 18:02, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 05:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-25 17:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-01-25 17:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 01/25/2012 05:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> We had two regressions in this code recently. So test all
On 01/25/2012 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 18:02, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 05:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-01-25 17:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-25 17:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 05:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> We had tw
On 2012-01-25 18:44, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-25 18:02, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 01/25/2012 05:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-25 17:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 17:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On
On 01/25/2012 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-25 18:02, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 05:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-01-25 17:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-25 17:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 05:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> We had tw
10 matches
Mail list logo