Hello,
please apply the attached simple patch, which resolves a kind of
compilation problems against 2.6.30 kernel.
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
From 894660f7dc91b406d8e078247b46606778562de9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy vladimir.zapols...@siemens.com
Date: Thu, 11 Jun
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hello,
please apply the attached simple patch, which resolves a kind of
compilation problems against 2.6.30 kernel.
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
From 894660f7dc91b406d8e078247b46606778562de9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hi Jan,
I observed that LINUX_VERSION_CODE comparisons are common enough in
Xenomai code. Do you propose to make a separate header, which is
included from nucleus, drivers and arch files?
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hello,
please
Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Jan,
I observed that LINUX_VERSION_CODE comparisons are common enough in
Xenomai code. Do you propose to make a separate header, which is
included from nucleus, drivers and arch files?
Yes, it's common, but we also keep a lot of wrapping in asm-*/wrappers.h.
Jan
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:16 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Jan,
I observed that LINUX_VERSION_CODE comparisons are common enough in
Xenomai code. Do you propose to make a separate header, which is
included from nucleus, drivers and arch files?
Yes, it's common,
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.
The updated patch is attached.
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:16 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Jan,
I observed that LINUX_VERSION_CODE comparisons are common enough in
