Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > (...) But I would vote for a split between the user-space > > latency measurement tool and the display tool for kernel-space latency. > > > > What's your main concern about the current solution? The need to have > RTDM being loaded to sta

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > (...) But I would vote for a split between the user-space > > latency measurement tool and the display tool for kernel-space latency. > > > > What's your main concern about the current solution? The need to have > RTDM being loaded to sta

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-22 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency > > benchmarks. > > > > More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a > > new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-22 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi all, > > this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency > benchmarks. > > More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a > new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task or timer > periodically. The benchmark dev

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi all, this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency benchmarks. More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task or timer periodically. The benchmark device generates all the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-22 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency > > benchmarks. > > > > More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a > > new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-22 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi all, > > this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency > benchmarks. > > More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a > new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task or timer > periodically. The benchmark dev

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi all, this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency benchmarks. More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task or timer periodically. The benchmark device generates all the

[Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi all, this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency benchmarks. More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task or timer periodically. The benchmark device generates all the usual latency data w

[Xenomai-core] [RFC] in-kernel timer benchmark

2005-12-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi all, this is fully working proposal how to re-enable in-kernel timer latency benchmarks. More precisely, it adds a new RTDM device "rtbenchmark" (and also a new RTDM class) which can execute either a kernel task or timer periodically. The benchmark device generates all the usual latency data w