HI Jan,
I am runnng the testsuite given by RTAI and Xenomai,
I need to this figures to compare on performance for
the doc to port XENOMAI on MIPS.
I see RTAI gives results in nanoseconds and XENOMAI in
microsecond, so i should say latency with Xenomai is
3000 micrsecond where as RTAI its 3000 Nanosecond ,
correct me if I am wrong.
I have attached both testsuite reults
Thanks In Advance
Neelu
--- Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Miguel Angel Alvarez wrote:
> > I am also very intrerested in this kind of porting
> guidance, because I
> > have to evaluate the difficulties in porting
> Xenomai (and Adeos) into
> > Coldfire v4 (m68k) architecture.
>
> See this posting for the Adeos part:
>
>
https://mail.gna.org/public/adeos-main/2006-09/msg1.html
>
> Regarding the porting effort of Xenomai: I would
> recommend to browse
> through existing architectures, e.g. Blackfin, in
> order to asses the
> amount and complexity of services you have to deal
> with.
>
> Jan
>
>
__
Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/== Sampling period: 100 us
== Test mode: periodic user-mode task
== All results in microseconds
warming up...
RTT| 00:00:01 (periodic user-mode task, 100 us period)
RTH|-lat min|-lat avg|-lat max|-overrun|lat best|---lat worst
RTD| 0.363| 1.307| 6.443| 0| 0.363| 6.443
RTD| 0.259| 68.339| 594.219| 5| 0.259| 594.219
RTD| 500.179| 18.290| 506.059| 5| 0.259| 594.219
RTD| 500.254| 18.285| 505.818| 5| 0.259| 594.219
RTD| 500.265| 18.323| 506.288| 5| 0.259| 594.219
RTD| 500.212| 18.288| 508.575| 5| 0.259| 594.219
RTD| 500.354| -2.511|1129.323| 11| 0.259|1129.323
RTD|1100.297| -25.688|1108.217| 11| 0.259|1129.323
RTD|1100.244| -25.686|1108.423| 11| 0.259|1129.323
RTD|1100.177| -25.686|1108.608| 11| 0.259|1129.323
RTD|1100.172| 16.570|1675.939| 16| 0.259|1675.939
RTD|1600.103| -8.670|1608.491| 16| 0.259|1675.939
RTD|1600.266| -8.666|1608.856| 16| 0.259|1675.939
RTD|1600.227| -8.665|1608.532| 16| 0.259|1675.939
RTD|1600.025| -8.662|1608.813| 16| 0.259|1675.939
RTD|1600.415| 29.702|2202.194| 21| 0.259|2202.194
RTD|2100.416| 8.355|2108.844| 21| 0.259|2202.194
RTD|2100.301| 8.355|2108.579| 21| 0.259|2202.194
RTD|2100.323| 8.350|2108.491| 21| 0.259|2202.194
RTD|2100.137| 8.352|2108.733| 21| 0.259|2202.194
RTD|2100.402| 42.772|2661.862| 26| 0.259|2661.862
RTT| 00:00:22 (periodic user-mode task, 100 us period)
RTH|-lat min|-lat avg|-lat max|-overrun|lat best|---lat worst
RTD|2600.325| 25.370|2608.703| 26| 0.259|2661.862
RTD|2600.041| 25.371|2608.807| 26| 0.259|2661.862
RTD|2600.179| 25.368|2608.871| 26| 0.259|2661.862
RTD|2600.228| 38.876|3201.108| 31| 0.259|3201.108
RTD|3100.178| 42.382|3109.105| 31| 0.259|3201.108
RTD|3098.880| 42.348|3108.497| 31| 0.259|3201.108
RTD|3098.891| 42.361|3109.042| 31| 0.259|3201.108
RTD|3100.342| 42.399|3108.477| 31| 0.259|3201.108
RTD|3100.263| 52.008|3648.872| 36| 0.259|3648.872
RTD|3600.352| 59.412|3608.707| 36| 0.259|3648.872
RTD|3600.307| 59.408|3608.992| 36| 0.259|3648.872
RTD|3600.490| 59.400|3608.473| 36| 0.259|3648.872
RTD|3600.300| 59.404|3609.087| 36| 0.259|3648.872
RTD|3600.145| 65.078|4192.166| 41| 0.259|4192.166
RTD|3748.422| 76.426|4108.637| 41| 0.259|4192.166
RTD|3748.422| 76.424|4108.577| 41| 0.259|4192.166
RTD|3748.422| 76.427|4108.534| 41| 0.259|4192.166
RTD|3748.422| 76.423|4108.954| 41| 0.259|4192.166
RTD|3748.422| 14.152|4725.161| 47| 0.259|4725.161
RTD|3748.422| 32.450|4708.704| 47| 0.259|4725.161
RTD|3748.422| 32.474|4708.777| 47| 0.259|4725.161
RTT| 00:00:43 (periodic user-mode task, 100 us period)
RTH|-lat min|-lat avg|-lat max|-overrun|lat best|---lat worst
RTD|3748.422| 32.828|4709.
