Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-06-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 11:14 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > ... > >> This > >> is a widely orthogonal issue, so please let us come back to my original > >> point. > >> > > > > The original proposal suggests an ad hoc solution for a specific class > > of tracing needs (code flow

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-06-05 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: ... >> This >> is a widely orthogonal issue, so please let us come back to my original >> point. >> > > The original proposal suggests an ad hoc solution for a specific class > of tracing needs (code flow analysis with low temporal invasiveness) > (*). > > I suggest that we

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-06-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > > panic. See the code flow from xntimer_start_*periodic for instance, up > > to the point where the timer is enqueued. > > With wrong I meant valid sched, but for an incorrect CPU. > As explained earlier, nothing really bad would happen

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-06-02 Thread ROSSIER Daniel
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xenomai-core- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Kiszka > Sent: vendredi 1 juin 2007 08:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: xenomai-core > Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-05-31 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: >> ... xeno-kill-ipipe_processor_id.patch Refreshed cleanup patch to remove ipipe_processor_id completely. >>> The logic of this patch is flawed. rthal_processor_id() already implies >>> rawness wrt how we fetch the current CPU number, so >>> rthal_raw_proce

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-05-31 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 22:39 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 13:31 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Instead of posting yet another stream of individual patches from my > >> queue, I decided to put them all into a series and upload them. See > >> > >>http:/

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-05-31 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 22:39 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 13:31 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Instead of posting yet another stream of individual patches from my > >> queue, I decided to put them all into a series and upload them. See > >> > >>http:/

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-05-31 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 13:31 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Instead of posting yet another stream of individual patches from my >> queue, I decided to put them all into a series and upload them. See >> >> http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/rtaddon/patches >> >> for my latest I-

Re: [Xenomai-core] [ANNOUNCE] Xenomai and I-pipe patch series, LTTng bits

2007-05-31 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 13:31 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Instead of posting yet another stream of individual patches from my > queue, I decided to put them all into a series and upload them. See > > http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/rtaddon/patches > > for my latest I-pipe, Xenomai, and LTTng en