Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/6] Fix, refactor, and optimize xnlock services, v2

2008-03-28 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe, I noticed that you merged patch 1-4. What are the plans for (or concerns about) the ticket xnlock and the UP debugging changes? Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org h

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/6] Fix, refactor, and optimize xnlock services, v2

2008-03-03 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > > > Well, I am still not convinced, I still find the debugging version harder > > to read. Is there a problem with implementing the two versions > > separately with a unique #ifdef? > > Well

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/6] Fix, refactor, and optimize xnlock services, v2

2008-03-02 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here comes version 2 of my xnlock rework. Changes since the first > > release: > > > > - Moved xnlock_spin out-of-line instead uninlining the irqsave/restore > >services > > The size changes are not as dramatic as with t

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/6] Fix, refactor, and optimize xnlock services, v2

2008-03-02 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi, > > here comes version 2 of my xnlock rework. Changes since the first > release: > > - Moved xnlock_spin out-of-line instead uninlining the irqsave/restore >services The size changes are not as dramatic as with the first version. Did you have any chance to tes