On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 10:03 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 7/18/07, Philippe Gerum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:30 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > The attached patch fixes this, though I am not sure it is the best way
> > > to fix it.
> >
> > Looks good.
On 7/18/07, Philippe Gerum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:30 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > The attached patch fixes this, though I am not sure it is the best way
> > to fix it.
>
> Looks good. The only thing that still bothers me is that, at some
> point, it seems t
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:30 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when xnarch_program_next_timer_shot is passed a null delay and there is
> no other timed event pending, the mvm terminates with the message:
> "nothing to schedule".
>
Actually, this is a purely event-driven engine, so if w
