Re: [Xenomai-core] [rt shared irqs] ipipe-related changes (draft)

2005-12-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hi Dmitry, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi everybody, the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rt shared irqs] ipipe-related changes (draft)

2005-12-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hi Dmitry, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi everybody, the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rt shared irqs] ipipe-related changes (draft)

2005-12-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi everybody, the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the irq

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rt shared irqs] ipipe-related changes (draft)

2005-12-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi everybody, the enclosed patches (the first version, hence it's still raw) are supposed to build the basis needed on the ipipe layer for adding support of real-time shared interrupts. As a side effect, the irq_trampoline() layer has been eliminated and the irq