Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 05.01.2011 21:25, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi Gilles,
the attached patch fixes the issue.
>>> Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
>>> around
>>>
Am 05.01.2011 21:25, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> the attached patch fixes the issue.
>>>
>>
>> Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
>> around
>>
>> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> the attached patch fixes the issue.
>>
>
> Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
> around
>
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,36)
> #define platform_device of_devi
Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> the attached patch fixes the issue.
>
Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
around
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,36)
#define platform_device of_device
#endif
and update the users to
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> the attached patch fixes the issue.
Applied, thanks.
--
Gilles.
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listin
Hi Gilles,
the attached patch fixes the issue.
On 01/02/2011 08:53 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> It seems we have an issue building rtcan for mpc5xxx with Linux 2.6.36.
> As far as I understood the of_device structure disappeared and the
> "device tree" bits were integrat
