Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that xnhead_extend() is not used at the moment [1], thus the
>> whole extent management is redundent for now. Are there plans to use it
>> in the future? Should we keep this feature?
>>
>> I'm asking as I still have the idea in my
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that xnhead_extend() is not used at the moment [1], thus the
whole extent management is redundent for now. Are there plans to use it
in the future? Should we keep this feature?
I'm asking as I still have the idea in my head of breaking up the heap
service and int
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that xnhead_extend() is not used at the moment [1], thus the
>> whole extent management is redundent for now. Are there plans to use it
>> in the future? Should we keep this feature?
>>
>> I'm asking as I still have the idea in my
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that xnhead_extend() is not used at the moment [1], thus the
whole extent management is redundent for now. Are there plans to use it
in the future? Should we keep this feature?
I'm asking as I still have the idea in my head of breaking up the heap
service and int
