Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. T
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Hi,
on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
handles the SIGILL
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
>>> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
>>> handles the SIGILL by printing an error message an
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
>>> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
>>> handles the SIGILL by printing an error message an
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
>> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
>> handles the SIGILL by printing an error message and exiting.
>>
>
> This is an issue
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
> handles the SIGILL by printing an error message and exiting.
>
This is an issue for archs that encode the syscal
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Hi,
on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
>>> I don't see this on x86, though.
>>>
Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
>> I don't see this on x86, though.
>>
>>> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
>>> handles the SIG
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
>
> I don't see this on x86, though.
>
>> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
>> handles the SIGILL by printing an error message a
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on some (all ?) platforms, we get a SIGILL when trying to emit the first
I don't see this on x86, though.
> Xenomai syscall, instead of the -ENOSYS return value. This patches
> handles the SIGILL by printing an error message and exiting.
>
> Index: includ
10 matches
Mail list logo