Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-02-02 Thread Philippe Gerum
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-02-02 Thread Philippe Gerum
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrup

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >>>

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> > Therefore we need a dedicated function t

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_ir

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, b

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) >> >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_i

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in > >> the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in >> the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is >> more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable.

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >>>

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrup

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> > Therefore we need a dedicated function t

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_ir

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, b

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) >> >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_i

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in > >> the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in >> the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is >> more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable.

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enab

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enab

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-24 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enab

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-24 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enab

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enab

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enable is used in various place/sk

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello, > > with RTnet over Xenomai and Linux 2.4 on PowerPC I realized that Xenomai > does not distinguish between a normal IRQ enable and an IRQ unmask at > the end of an ISR (to reenable the IRQ). In the latter case the IRQ > sh

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello, > > with RTnet over Xenomai and Linux 2.4 on PowerPC I realized that Xenomai > does not distinguish between a normal IRQ enable and an IRQ unmask at > the end of an ISR (to reenable the IRQ). In the latter case the IRQ > should be enabled on PowerPC as

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enab

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the > ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more > obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I > realized, that *_irq_enable is used in various place/sk

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello, > > with RTnet over Xenomai and Linux 2.4 on PowerPC I realized that Xenomai > does not distinguish between a normal IRQ enable and an IRQ unmask at > the end of an ISR (to reenable the IRQ). In the latter case the IRQ > sh

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello, > > with RTnet over Xenomai and Linux 2.4 on PowerPC I realized that Xenomai > does not distinguish between a normal IRQ enable and an IRQ unmask at > the end of an ISR (to reenable the IRQ). In the latter case the IRQ > should be enabled on PowerPC as