> > CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> > This option messes with the oneshot timer (timer freezes).
> > (thanks to Gilles to have found this out)
>
> Could you confirm that this issue still happens with
> adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-1.0-05 or higher?
Ok. I have just checked adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-1.0-09 with
CONFIG_PCI_MSI ena
Romain Lenglet wrote:
>> Actually, Dmitry and I are discussing IRQ sharing between
>> real-time driver, not across the RT/non-RT border.
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood.
>
>> The latter case almost always a no-go and should rather be
>> solved at hardware level by rearranging the IRQ usage (where
>> p
> Actually, Dmitry and I are discussing IRQ sharing between
> real-time driver, not across the RT/non-RT border.
Sorry, I misunderstood.
> The latter case almost always a no-go and should rather be
> solved at hardware level by rearranging the IRQ usage (where
> possible...). The problem is that
Romain Lenglet wrote:
> ...
> Otherwise, my biggest source of problems is IRQ sharing between
> realtime and non-realtime drivers: this predictably provokes
> kernel panics. But Jan seems to be working on it.
>
Actually, Dmitry and I are discussing IRQ sharing between real-time
driver, not acro
Romain Lenglet wrote:
- A kernel option that causes Xenomai (or Adeos) to blatantly
malfunction or even crash is a freaking BUG, and should be
reported asap to the Xenomai-core list or the Adeos-main list.
IOW, there is no such thing as options allowed to crash your
box with Adeos/Xenomai because
> > CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> > This option messes with the oneshot timer (timer freezes).
> > (thanks to Gilles to have found this out)
>
> Could you confirm that this issue still happens with
> adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-1.0-05 or higher?
Ok. I have just checked adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-1.0-09 with
CONFIG_PCI_MSI ena
Romain Lenglet wrote:
>> Actually, Dmitry and I are discussing IRQ sharing between
>> real-time driver, not across the RT/non-RT border.
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood.
>
>> The latter case almost always a no-go and should rather be
>> solved at hardware level by rearranging the IRQ usage (where
>> p
> Actually, Dmitry and I are discussing IRQ sharing between
> real-time driver, not across the RT/non-RT border.
Sorry, I misunderstood.
> The latter case almost always a no-go and should rather be
> solved at hardware level by rearranging the IRQ usage (where
> possible...). The problem is that
Romain Lenglet wrote:
> ...
> Otherwise, my biggest source of problems is IRQ sharing between
> realtime and non-realtime drivers: this predictably provokes
> kernel panics. But Jan seems to be working on it.
>
Actually, Dmitry and I are discussing IRQ sharing between real-time
driver, not acro
Romain Lenglet wrote:
- A kernel option that causes Xenomai (or Adeos) to blatantly
malfunction or even crash is a freaking BUG, and should be
reported asap to the Xenomai-core list or the Adeos-main list.
IOW, there is no such thing as options allowed to crash your
box with Adeos/Xenomai because
10 matches
Mail list logo
