Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> A small program only calling rt_task_shadow with NULL-name fails if i start it
> a second time. Error EEXIST (-17). Same for a program calling only
> rt_task_spawn with NULL-name.
I am able to observe this behaviour. I am on it.
> Ap
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> A small program only calling rt_task_shadow with NULL-name fails if i start it
> a second time. Error EEXIST (-17). Same for a program calling only
> rt_task_spawn with NULL-name.
I am able to observe this behaviour. I am on it.
> Ap
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> > A small program only calling rt_task_shadow with NULL-name fails if i
> start it
> > a second time. Error EEXIST (-17). Same for a program calling only
> > rt_task_spawn with NULL-name.
>
> I am able to observe this behaviour.
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> A small program only calling rt_task_shadow with NULL-name fails if i start
> it
> a second time. Error EEXIST (-17). Same for a program calling only
> rt_task_spawn with NULL-name.
I am able to observe this behaviour. I am on it.
> Apropos registry:
> In the t
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> > A small program only calling rt_task_shadow with NULL-name fails if i
> start it
> > a second time. Error EEXIST (-17). Same for a program calling only
> > rt_task_spawn with NULL-name.
>
> I am able to observe this behaviour.
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> A small program only calling rt_task_shadow with NULL-name fails if i start
> it
> a second time. Error EEXIST (-17). Same for a program calling only
> rt_task_spawn with NULL-name.
I am able to observe this behaviour. I am on it.
> Apropos registry:
> In the t