Philippe Gerum wrote:
> There is one for the nucleus already, so maybe we could extend the
> feature. This said, the point ABI revs is basically to detect potential
> mismatches; would an old POSIX app run improperly over the new library,
> or would it choke at startup?
The mismatch would occur if
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:44 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >
> > The Xenomai ABI has been kept compatible between versions
>
> I am afraid you are being optimistic: I for one made some changes in the
> posix skin that break the kernel/user interface.
Sorry, I've bee
Philippe Gerum wrote:
>
> The Xenomai ABI has been kept compatible between versions
I am afraid you are being optimistic: I for one made some changes in the
posix skin that break the kernel/user interface. Maybe we need an ABI
revision for each skin ?
--
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:39 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we just had some fun here with incompatible native libraries. A program
> was built against some 2.2 release and was then started on a target with
> 2.3 libs installed. The result: undefined symbol rt_mutex_lock. The
> reason: this fun
