Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm dumb x86 user who unfortunately just seem to have tumbled in the
cross-compilation trap: I'm trying to generate i586 code on a fancy new
and fast x86_64 compilation host. I
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Probably grabbing more stuff from the kernel cflags into XENO_ARCH_FLAGS
(e.g.
-m[0-9]* to start with). Gilles, would this be ok?
Probably, but last time I checked that, the ppc-compiled version of the
dummy program used at configuration time to extract the arch
Jan Kiszka wrote:
...
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/xenomai/build/skins/native/lib'
if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=compile --tag=CC gcc -m32
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/tmp/xenomai/skins/native/lib -I../../../include
-O2 -I/tmp/linux-2.6.13.1/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D__XENO__
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm dumb x86 user who unfortunately just seem to have tumbled in the
cross-compilation trap: I'm trying to generate i586 code on a fancy
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
I just analysed this further: the problem disappears when I manually
remove any -Ipath-to-kernel-includes from the makefiles. Seems to be
the well-known user space include issue again... ;)
This is wrong, the include files that should be used are those
Jan Kiszka wrote:
#! /bin/sh
exec `expr $0 : 'i686-linux-\(.*\)'` -m32r ${1+$@}
It should work with most build systems...
Yes, this seems to work (and fail) just like the CC= approach.
Are you sure your distribution does not provide a cross-compiler ? I
worked once on an
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
I just analysed this further: the problem disappears when I manually
remove any -Ipath-to-kernel-includes from the makefiles. Seems to be
the well-known user space include issue again... ;)
This is wrong, the include
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
#! /bin/sh
exec `expr $0 : 'i686-linux-\(.*\)'` -m32r ${1+$@}
It should work with most build systems...
Yes, this seems to work (and fail) just like the CC= approach.
Are you sure your distribution does not provide a
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Probably grabbing more stuff from the kernel cflags into
XENO_ARCH_FLAGS (e.g.
-m[0-9]* to start with). Gilles, would this be ok?
Probably, but last time I checked that, the ppc-compiled version
Jan Kiszka wrote:
I just analysed this further: the problem disappears when I manually
remove any -Ipath-to-kernel-includes from the makefiles. Seems to be
the well-known user space include issue again... ;)
I tried to compile every kernel arch/i386 has a patch for with gcc 2.95,
3.3 and
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
I just analysed this further: the problem disappears when I manually
remove any -Ipath-to-kernel-includes from the makefiles. Seems to be
the well-known user space include issue again... ;)
I tried to compile every kernel arch/i386 has a
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
I just analysed this further: the problem disappears when I manually
remove any -Ipath-to-kernel-includes from the makefiles. Seems to be
the well-known user space include issue again... ;)
I tried to
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
I just analysed this further: the problem disappears when I manually
remove any -Ipath-to-kernel-includes from the makefiles. Seems to
be
the well-known user space include issue
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm dumb x86 user who unfortunately just seem to have tumbled in the
cross-compilation trap: I'm trying to generate i586 code on a fancy new
and fast x86_64 compilation host. I got the kernel compiled with
ARCH=i386, using only the pre-installed compiler (i.e. no
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm dumb x86 user who unfortunately just seem to have tumbled in the
cross-compilation trap: I'm trying to generate i586 code on a fancy new
and fast x86_64 compilation host. I got the kernel compiled with
ARCH=i386, using only the
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm dumb x86 user who unfortunately just seem to have tumbled in the
cross-compilation trap: I'm trying to generate i586 code on a fancy new
and fast x86_64 compilation host. I got the kernel compiled with
ARCH=i386,
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm dumb x86 user who unfortunately just seem to have tumbled in the
cross-compilation trap: I'm trying to generate i586
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm dumb x86 user who unfortunately just seem to have tumbled in the
cross-compilation trap: I'm
18 matches
Mail list logo
