look compatible tool for bottom-posting?)
> -Original Message-
> From: Xenomai [mailto:xenomai-boun...@xenomai.org] On Behalf Of
> Lowell Gilbert
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 9:04 AM
> To: xenomai@xenomai.org
> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] rtdm_timer_start latency?
>
&g
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> Lowell Gilbert writes:
>
>> Philippe Gerum writes:
>>
>>> On 02/09/2018 11:02 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 02/09/2018 12:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that when calling rtdm_timer_start(), I should
> not be getting multi-second lat
Lange Norbert writes:
> this seems identical to an issue I have. I wanted to start a
> millisecond tick, aligned to seconds, but used the POSIX
> timerfd_settime. Under Linux this works as intendent, under cobalt it
> doesn't.
>
> I expect that the first timeout would be somewhat close to the ca
ai.org] On Behalf Of Lowell
>Gilbert
>Sent: Montag, 12. Februar 2018 14:41
>To: xenomai@xenomai.org
>Subject: Re: [Xenomai] rtdm_timer_start latency?
>
>E-MAIL FROM A NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE: AS A SECURITY MEASURE, PLEASE
>EXERCISE CAUTION WITH E-MAIL CONTENT AND ANY LINKS
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> Philippe Gerum writes:
>
>> On 02/09/2018 11:02 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 02/09/2018 12:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that when calling rtdm_timer_start(), I should
not be getting multi-second latencies before the first call to th
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> To put it another way, I'm trying to figure out what am I doing wrong in:
> ret = rtdm_timer_start(&pstate.collect.timer, rtdm_clock_read()
> + 1,
> pstate.collect.period,
> RTDM_TIME
Philippe Gerum writes:
> On 02/09/2018 11:02 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 02/09/2018 12:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>>> Am I correct in assuming that when calling rtdm_timer_start(), I should
>>> not be getting multi-second latencies before the first call to the timer
>>> routine? Just checki
On 02/09/2018 11:02 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 12:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Am I correct in assuming that when calling rtdm_timer_start(), I should
>> not be getting multi-second latencies before the first call to the timer
>> routine? Just checking before I dig in too far.
>>
On 02/09/2018 12:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that when calling rtdm_timer_start(), I should
> not be getting multi-second latencies before the first call to the timer
> routine? Just checking before I dig in too far.
>
Of course not. I suspect an absolute expiry time i
