Re: Multiple Attributes Challenge

2002-03-25 Thread Brad Settlemyer
I only know SAX2, but in sax2 you would simply use the attributes object, and look the values up by qname or integer index. On Tuesday 26 March 2002 02:42 am, you wrote: > Here is a little challenger. I am trying to parse a response which comes > back from the server. Te server side I am workin

Multiple Attributes Challenge

2002-03-25 Thread Anton Spektorov
Here is a little challenger. I am trying to parse a response which comes back from the server. Te server side I am working with was created back in the days and XML response is absolutely invalid. But nobody on a server side is going to change it, so I am stuck with it.  Here is the doc:  

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7471] New: - Failed to validate correctly when schema has and the base has an attribute

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: exec-prefix not used?

2002-03-25 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 19:03, David Starks-Browning wrote: > I think it would be a very big job. And one would have to have access > to OS/390 (hah!) to test all the changes. If there are any OS/390 users then they will tell us about any breakage. If they don't tell us then there aren't any OS/39

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7164] - DOMParser with a DTD leak!

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: linux and iconv

2002-03-25 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
- Original Message - From: "Haase, Donald P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:57 PM Subject: RE: linux and iconv > what build errors are you getting? That is my steps: runConfigure -plinux -cgcc -xg++ -tIconvFBSD then I'v patched file src/xerce

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7164] - DOMParser with a DTD leak!

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7458] New: - Schema validator does not automatically associate the xml prefix to the "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" URI

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: exec-prefix not used?

2002-03-25 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"David Starks-Browning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 25 Mar 02, Jason E. Stewart writes: > > I would really like to see the make process embrace the full benefit > > of automake and autoconf. Right now it sort of dabbles with it. I > > don't know enough about overhauling the system, and I do

Re: exec-prefix not used?

2002-03-25 Thread David Starks-Browning
On 25 Mar 02, Jason E. Stewart writes: > I would really like to see the make process embrace the full benefit > of automake and autoconf. Right now it sort of dabbles with it. I > don't know enough about overhauling the system, and I don't have an > enormous amount of time for such a project, but

RE: linux and iconv

2002-03-25 Thread Haase, Donald P
what build errors are you getting? -Original Message- From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux and iconv Hello! I don't understand how I can build Xerces under Linux with a iconv support. Iconv390 and I

Re: exec-prefix not used?

2002-03-25 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"David Starks-Browning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greetings, > > I'm building xerces-c-src1_7_0.tar.gz on a number of platforms, > starting with alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 (using gcc/g++ 3.0.4). > > I notice that "make install" installs libxerces-c1_7_0.so in > $PREFIX/lib. I would prefer to hav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2531] - runConfigure is not executable

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7307] - DOM Parser's ErrorHandler Class's fatalError() function generates Segmentation Fault

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7164] - DOMParser with a DTD leak!

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

exec-prefix not used?

2002-03-25 Thread David Starks-Browning
Greetings, I'm building xerces-c-src1_7_0.tar.gz on a number of platforms, starting with alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 (using gcc/g++ 3.0.4). I notice that "make install" installs libxerces-c1_7_0.so in $PREFIX/lib. I would prefer to have this go to $EPREFIX/lib where EPREFIX=@exec_prefix@ is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7448] New: - Would like DOMString::operator< for STL use, code provided

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7164] - DOMParser with a DTD leak!

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2531] - runConfigure is not executable

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7440] - Make Error/Message Extension Of The XMLValidator Possible

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7440] - Make Error/Message Extension Of The XMLValidator Possible

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7440] - Make Error/Message Extension Of The XMLValidator Possible

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7440] New: - Make Error/Message Extension Of The XMLValidator Possible

2002-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu