Hi Viet,
There is no project manager as such. There are a group of committers
and the user community. We all discuss what should happen next and then
decide if we have the resources to implement it (much like the
discussion at the moment). Does anyone know if we do support solaris
10? If not
Hi,
I afraid there are no such documents. If you have any specific
question then post the to the list and we will answer them.
Gareth
On 18 Feb 2005, at 6:56, J Satish wrote:
HI all,
I'm searching for the design documents of xerces-c. I have
searched all over the Apache site. But all my effort
+1
Gareth
On 17 Feb 2005, at 22:11, James Berry wrote:
Since we now have a confirmed resource (Jason Stewart) to take charge
of moving the source repository from cvs to svn, I'd like to call for
a formal vote of committers that we proceed forward with this.
Proposal:
- Move Xerces-c source
Here is my +1.
Alberto
At 14.51 17/02/2005 -0800, James Berry wrote:
I'd like to officially nominate Dave Bertoni as a Xerces-C Committer.
Dave, partly through his work on Xalan-C, has been a near constant
presence on the Xerces-C list for as many years as I've been hanging out
there, and that's
+1
Gareth
On 17 Feb 2005, at 22:51, James Berry wrote:
I'd like to officially nominate Dave Bertoni as a Xerces-C Committer.
Dave, partly through his work on Xalan-C, has been a near constant
presence on the Xerces-C list for as many years as I've been hanging
out there, and that's been more tha
+1
Alberto
At 14.11 17/02/2005 -0800, James Berry wrote:
Since we now have a confirmed resource (Jason Stewart) to take charge of
moving the source repository from cvs to svn, I'd like to call for a
formal vote of committers that we proceed forward with this.
Proposal:
- Move Xerces-c source
HI,
Thx for the response. So what if I want to contribute something
for xerces development where should I start. Or is there any other
project in(c++) Apache where I can contribute.
Thx & regards
Satish Jupalli
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
J Satish wrote:
HI,
Thx for the response. So what if I want to contribute something
for xerces development where should I start. Or is there any other
project in(c++) Apache where I can contribute.
Decide what it is you would like to contribute (there is a discussion
list at the moment, b
Hi,
Sorry for not mentioning in which area I would like to contribute.
I'm good at C++/Java. I would like to contribute here because I can work
with people who has good knowledge, and I strongly feel that I can learn
a lot.
Thx & Regards
Satish Jupalli
-Original Message-
From:
At 09.45 18/02/2005 +, Gareth Reakes wrote:
Hi Viet,
There is no project manager as such. There are a group of
committers and the user community. We all discuss what should happen next
and then decide if we have the resources to implement it (much like the
discussion at the moment).
Hey,
Alberto Massari wrote:
At 09.45 18/02/2005 +, Gareth Reakes wrote:
Hi Viet,
There is no project manager as such. There are a group of
committers and the user community. We all discuss what should happen
next and then decide if we have the resources to implement it (much
like the
James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Committers, please vote.
+1
Regards,
David A. Cargill
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
(905) 413-2371, tie 969
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Committers, please vote.
+1
Regards,
David A. Cargill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
You could start by helping Alby and I move over to the DOM Level 3
stuff. How much time do you think you will be able to contribute?
Gareth
J Satish wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for not mentioning in which area I would like to contribute.
I'm good at C++/Java. I would like to contribute here because I
James Berry wrote:
Committers, please vote.
+1
Good luck !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Berry wrote:
Committers, please vote.
+1
Good luck !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:11 PM, James Berry wrote:
Committers, please vote.
I guess I need to vote on this one too...
+1
-jdb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's my +1.
Khaled
James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/17/2005 05:51 PM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
To
xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
cc
Subject
Nomination of David Bertoni
as Xerces-C committer
I'd like to officially nominate Dave Bertoni as a
Xerces-C Committer.
D
+1
Khaled
James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/17/2005 05:11 PM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
To
xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
cc
Subject
Call for Vote: move xerces-c
repository to svn
Since we now have a confirmed resource (Jason Stewart)
to take charge
of moving the s
Can anybody help me determine the list of active committers to Xerces-c?
Here's the list of all Xerces committers (java, p, c, I believe) from
CVSROOT:
andyc,abagchi,rahulj,rwebster,roddey,rpfeiffe,gmarcy,arkin,aruna1,mode,l
ehors,jeffreyr,andyh,ericye,edwingo,duncan,david,mpogue,jpolast,twl,jb
Just curious: how many Sun Sr. MTS folks have shown historical interest
in the project? And why didn't the approach come from that quadrant?
While "market engineering" is good; it is my suggestion that "XML
software engineering" would be more helpful in our context.
And, also, Alberto, the VMwar
At 08.20 18/02/2005 -0800, Mark Deric wrote:
Just curious: how many Sun Sr. MTS folks have shown historical interest
in the project? And why didn't the approach come from that quadrant?
While "market engineering" is good; it is my suggestion that "XML
software engineering" would be more helpful in
> >And, also, Alberto, the VMware/gcc/x86 comment was downright nasty! I
> >bet Viet could get you a "discount" on SPARC/Forte(SunOne?); probably a
> >discount on training, too!
>
> I would have problems fitting it in my office ;-); but it would be nice
if
> Sun donated a bunch of Solaris hardw
Hi James,
I will sign up for testing the infrastructure changes on AIX, OS390 and
Linux using xlC. I will see if I can find someone to test OS400 as well.
For #20, I vote against. I know of a few people who are still using it
(yes I prompt them to move off of it). As of 2.6.0 it is in a separat
Hi,
I have a simple application that uses the SAX2 parser to parse a large
XML file with schema validation. During the parsing I can see the
application steadily using more memory. If I turn off the validation
(fgSAX2CoreValidation = false) the application uses a fixed amount of
memory regardless
Title: building Xerces-C statically with a static ICU for transcoding
Hey,
I am building ICU statically to link with Xerces-C (also static) for transcoding messages on windows with VC7.1. Everything works fine so farhowever I am skeptical that it actually worked the way it should have w
To anyone who cares about XMLUri...
The XMLUri class rejects a URI of this form:
"scheme:"
That is, it appears to require something after
the ":"
For example,
"scheme:" is rejected
"scheme:foo" is accepted
As far as I know, most anything after the colon is
scheme-specific.
R
That class is an implementation of RFC 2396 [1] which requires at least
one character after the colon:
absoluteURI = scheme ":" ( hier_part | opaque_part )
hier_part = ( net_path | abs_path ) [ "?" query ]
opaque_part = uric_no_slash *uric
uric_no_slash = unreserved | escaped | ";" | "?"
That class is an implementation of RFC 2396 [1] which requires at least
one character after the colon:
absoluteURI = scheme ":" ( hier_part | opaque_part )
hier_part = ( net_path | abs_path ) [ "?" query ]
opaque_part = uric_no_slash *uric
uric_no_slash = unreserved | escaped | ";" | "?" |
Hi David,
On Feb 18, 2005, at 9:52 AM, David Cargill wrote:
I will sign up for...
Thanks for all your great contributions.
For #20, I vote against. I know of a few people who are still using it
(yes I prompt them to move off of it). As of 2.6.0 it is in a separate
library so I don't think it that
On Feb 18, 2005, at 6:54 AM, Khaled Noaman wrote:
Here's my +1.
With Khaled's vote, I believe we have a +1 from all active committers (with the exception of Neil, who is out of town but who earlier privately expressed to me his support), and with no dissent ;)
I'd therefore like to welcome Dav
On Feb 18, 2005, at 6:56 AM, Khaled Noaman wrote:
+1
We also have complete consent on the move from cvs to svn, so we should move forward aggressively on this.
How's your work, Jason? ;)
-jdb
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
In thinking about changes for 3.0, another item I came up with is the
use of the .c extension for C++ files included as pseudo-templates.
Since this is also, confusingly, the extension typically used for
straight-c files, I'd like to propose that we change this. I think we
have two choices:
On Feb 18, 2005, at 3:32 PM, James Berry wrote:
In thinking about changes for 3.0, another item I came up with is the
use of the .c extension for C++ files included as pseudo-templates.
Actually, I think I mischaracterized the use of these files. In most
cases they are used to for the implementat
The only reason that was done was that, back in the stone age, I think that
some of the compilers we supported would only support templates in this form
(CFront based ones or something, I can't remember?) So we could support
those plus newer ones by just including the .c file into the .h/hpp file f
Thanks Dean, for that wonderful piece of historical archania.
Dave, have you (or anybody else) seen any compilers for which you
believe we'd still need to do as we do?
-jdb
On Feb 18, 2005, at 3:31 PM, Dean Roddey wrote:
The only reason that was done was that, back in the stone age, I think
that
> - Convert these files into actual templates, perhaps. I haven't
> looked enough into the implementations to know whether this is
> possible, or to discover what else might prevent us from doing this. I
> do know that we use templates elsewhere in Xerces, so this shouldn't
> break any com
On Feb 18, 2005, at 3:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Convert these files into actual templates, perhaps. I haven't
looked enough into the implementations to know whether this is
possible, or to discover what else might prevent us from doing this. I
do know that we use templates elsewhere in
38 matches
Mail list logo
