Re: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java (3rd try)

2000-03-25 Thread Pierpaolo Fumagalli
Mike Pogue wrote: > > Everybody can create bug reports now! http://xml.apache.org/bugs is > the place to do it... > Registration is free and quick! What happended to the 20$/bug support fee? Are you all nuts? :) :) :) Pier -- ---

Re: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java (3rd try)

2000-03-25 Thread Mike Pogue
Everybody can create bug reports now! http://xml.apache.org/bugs is the place to do it... Registration is free and quick! Thanks much!! Mike "George T. Joseph" wrote: > > This patch seems to keep getting lost. Could someone at least create a bug > report for the problem? > > Problem: Chunky

Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java (3rd try)

2000-03-25 Thread George T. Joseph
This patch seems to keep getting lost. Could someone at least create a bug report for the problem? Problem: ChunkyByteArray doesn't implement InputStream.close(). Other methods that call ChunkyByteArray.close() as they should, are actually invoking InputStream.close() which itself is a noop. C

FW: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java

2000-02-24 Thread George T. Joseph
I think we agreed on this one a few weeks ago but it was never applied. Is there still a problem? george -Original Message- From: George T. Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 11:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java OK

RE: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java

2000-02-08 Thread George T. Joseph
Original Message- From: Andy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 7:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java "George T. Joseph" wrote: > ChunkyByteArray didn't have a close() method so if > ChunkyByteArray.close()

Re: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java

2000-02-08 Thread Andy Clark
"George T. Joseph" wrote: > ChunkyByteArray didn't have a close() method so if > ChunkyByteArray.close() were called (and it IS being > called properly), it would be InputStream.close() that > was actually invoked. That's an empty method and > therefore a leak. You are absolutely correct. This

RE: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java

2000-02-07 Thread George T. Joseph
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java "George T. Joseph" wrote: > > Under 2 of 3 EOF conditions, the InputStream under ChunkyByteArray was not being > closed before fInputStream was

Re: Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java

2000-02-07 Thread Andy Clark
"George T. Joseph" wrote: > > Under 2 of 3 EOF conditions, the InputStream under ChunkyByteArray was not > being > closed before fInputStream was set to null. This resulted in files being left > open even after all parsing was complete. Usually the JVM cleans this up > when > the InputStream

Patch for ChunkyByteArray.java

2000-02-07 Thread George T. Joseph
Under 2 of 3 EOF conditions, the InputStream under ChunkyByteArray was not being closed before fInputStream was set to null. This resulted in files being left open even after all parsing was complete. Usually the JVM cleans this up when the InputStream is garbage collected. However, if the GC d