-2ex is OK, it looks remarkably like the output FontForge proposes.
To John: I don't think there should be copyright infringements, as I'm
modifying output, not the font per se. And what's more it's XeTeX that
gets it wrong, by apparently ignoring the *right* kerning set by font
designers. What
Am 06.02.2011 um 14:02 schrieb Alessandro Ceschini:
-2ex is OK, it looks remarkably like the output FontForge proposes.
You probably mean -0.2ex. 2ex is twice the width of an x. This would
make the two characters change positions and sequence...
Now, back to the kerning=mykerns, I heard
Am 06.02.2011 um 15:44 schrieb Herbert Schulz:
Hmmm... I thought 1ex was the height of an `x', not it's width,
which makes measuring a width using ex's is kind of strange.
A dimension or length is a dimension or length. Do you give the size
of a box in ex \times em? Is a height inch
On 7 February 2011 02:07, Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de wrote:
Am 06.02.2011 um 15:44 schrieb Herbert Schulz:
Hmmm... I thought 1ex was the height of an `x', not it's width, which
makes measuring a width using ex's is kind of strange.
A dimension or length is a dimension or
