Jean-Claude Raoult wrote:
Please, think of people using plain TeX. I am certainly not the only one.
Indeed you are not, Jean-Claude, and I too like ct and st ligatures
in high-quality typography. I am reasonably certain that it is
possible without using the execrable LaTeX, but with a
Am 19.06.2013 um 11:39 schrieb Philip Taylor:
If I find no more informative replies by the time I am next online,
I will investigate further and report back.
The fontspec manual describes it. The keywords are rlig, hlig, clig, etc. They
can be (de)activated in plain TeX as in:
The fontspec manual describes it. The keywords are rlig, hlig, clig, etc.
For more details on OpenType tags, you might want to check the
specification, and match the list of tags defined in the font at hand
with it: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/featuretags.htm
Also, the
Le 19/06/2013 12:23, Khaled Hosny a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Jean-Claude Raoult wrote:
The documentation is clear, for people using LaTeX or rather XeLaTeX.
Presumably because you were reading LaTeX oriented documentation? XeTeX
documentation itself documents the low
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Jean-Claude Raoult wrote:
Le 19/06/2013 12:23, Khaled Hosny a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Jean-Claude Raoult wrote:
The documentation is clear, for people using LaTeX or rather XeLaTeX.
Presumably because you were reading LaTeX
Thank you. This is just what I needed. Incidentally, the tag +liga
yielding ligatures for fi, ff, fl, ffi and ffl is the default.
It shoul be disabled for small caps:
I'm pretty sure this is taken care of by the font. Have you observed
a small caps fi ligature? I don't even see why a font
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:11:55PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Thank you. This is just what I needed. Incidentally, the tag +liga
yielding ligatures for fi, ff, fl, ffi and ffl is the default.
It shoul be disabled for small caps:
I'm pretty sure this is taken care of by the font.
Hello,
I am fond of (french) typography. Therefore, I would like XeTeX to
automatically change not only fi, ff, fl and the like, but also st and
ct — when available.
The documentation is clear, for people using LaTeX or rather XeLaTeX.
Unfortunately, I do not practice the english proverb why
Le 02/06/2013 14:44, John Was a écrit :
Hello
I use plain XeTeX also, but not that font. However, looking at the
Libertine website, I would suggest you add
:+hlig
to the font call (so e.g. Linux Libertine O:+hlig:mapping=tex-text)
If you right-click the font file itself and select
On 2010-12-04 00:17, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
Am 03.12.2010 um 16:30 schrieb Pander:
Another small font issue with XeLaTeX. The following
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\begin{document}
\fontspec{GilliusADF-Cond}\itshape
Am 04.12.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Pander:
Output of ttx provides more ligatures. I use ttx's output for my font
catalogue and for all other fonts, this info on ligatures is correct.
Because you use a certain tool, it is more correct than other people's? Isn't
this a rather silly statement? Well,
On 2010-12-04 17:40, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
Am 04.12.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Pander:
Output of ttx provides more ligatures. I use ttx's output for my font
catalogue and for all other fonts, this info on ligatures is correct.
Because you use a certain tool, it is more correct than other
Am 04.12.2010 um 17:40 schrieb Joachim Trinkwitz:
Because you use a certain tool, it is more correct than other
people's? Isn't this a rather silly statement? Well, if you think
Linotypes font manager is lying on me, then you know better, I
suppose ... (even the fact that several tools
you accurate information
about that.
HTH
J
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Claude Raoult jc.rao...@free.fr
To: xetex@tug.org
Sent: 20 November 2010 11:07
Subject: [XeTeX] ligatures in (plain) XeTeX
Hello,
My problem : getting ligatures with (plain) XeTeX, the engine being
Ross Moore wrote:
However, PDF has two separate mechanisms to overcome this.
1. a CMap resource for the font
2. the /ActualText tagging construction
Concerning method 1. CMap resources:
I don't know where that CMap resource is being constructed.
Presumably it is by xdvipdfmx as
Scripsit Gareth:
What is more, I do a lot of work with Syriac, a cursive script for which
most joined shapes are encoded in the PUA or somewhere that's going
spare. This means that my XeTeX PDFs aren't searchable or copyable in
Syriac. Only one or two Syriac letters per word can be searched or
Argh, this was not off-list. Please accept
my apologies, and also keep the information in
this confidential.
Philip Taylor
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
[Off-list] Have I told you that Thanh has created
a Win-32 version of the modified PdfTeX [...]
Hi Andy,
On 08/06/2010, at 11:39 AM, Andy Lin wrote:
It seems I misunderstood what exactly the TECkit mapping does. All it
does is change the input as instructed. All other features --
copy/paste and search compatibility -- I'd assumed was attributed to
TECkit is actually that of the PDF
One ting I'm wondering about: not all of the fonts I use always have
all those ligatures. From what I understand from you, can't check
right now, glyphs will be replaced usgin the mapping regardless of
glyph availability, which would lead to missing glyphs in the docuemnt
if not available.
The proper solution would be to use /ActualText feature of the PDF
specification.
I am very interested in this issue of searching PDFs. A google search for
PDF Actual Text turned up nothing. I then downloaded the actual PDF spec
from the Adobe web site and found the reference, and got the
On Mon, 10 May 2010 David J. Perry hospes.pri...@verizon.net wrote:
The proper solution would be to use /ActualText feature of the PDF
specification.
I am very interested in this issue of searching PDFs. A google search for
PDF Actual Text turned up nothing. I then downloaded the actual
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:26:11AM +0200, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 David J. Perry hospes.pri...@verizon.net wrote:
The proper solution would be to use /ActualText feature of the PDF
specification.
I am very interested in this issue of searching PDFs. A google search
On Tue, 11 May 2010 Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
[...]
IIRC, there are already latex packages that adds higher level support
for ActualText tags (low level support is already in the engines).
You are right:
23 matches
Mail list logo
