Am Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:51:22 + schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster,
Ret'd):
It is a very bad idea to make numbers active and to define them in
this way.
By way of demonstration that one can make digits active yet
still have access to the functionality that François needs,
I append the
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Well Francois wanted to avoid to have to write $7$ or \text{7)
instead of simply 7 in all sort of places. So I don't think a
solution which forces him to write \seven in all sort of places
offers him the functionality he needs.
But it doesn't; it requires him to write
Afterthought : surely the real point is to give François
a choice -- now at least he is aware that there is a simple
TeX solution to his problem, and that he does not need
to learn all the intricacies of fontspec in order to
solve a trivial problem.
** Phil.
Am Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:04:22 + schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster,
Ret'd):
Afterthought : surely the real point is to give François
a choice -- now at least he is aware that there is a simple
TeX solution to his problem, and that he does not need
to learn all the intricacies of fontspec in
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
And please don't repeat that you was not in any
way trying to suggest that this is a general or universal
solution.. You _did_ sent the first example without any code which
restricted the effect of the catcodes changes and without any
warnings about side-effects. This
Could you please calm down. Nobody was hurt, just a little misunderstanding.
Am 31.12.2010 15:35, schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd):
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
And please don't repeat that you was not in any
way trying to suggest that this is a general or universal
solution.. You _did_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 31/12/2010 15:35, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) a écrit :
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
And please don't repeat that you was not in any
way trying to suggest that this is a general or universal
solution.. You _did_ sent the first example
François Patte wrote:
I think that many people are like me: using latex and finding some
solutions to their problems but without going deeply into the technical
part of it. Mastering the side effects of a solution like yours is not
obvious and you should have given some information about the
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
It is a very bad idea to make numbers active and to define them in
this way.
By way of demonstration that one can make digits active yet
still have access to the functionality that François needs,
I append the following :
** Phil.
\documentclass {minimal}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/12/2010 21:03, Peter Dyballa a écrit :
Am 28.12.2010 um 19:44 schrieb François Patte:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
With XeTeX and fontspec loaded you also load xunicode. So you can write
as well:
Multiply 5 by 7: 7
Am Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:08:57 + schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster,
Ret'd):
Bonjour, François : is this perhaps the sort of
thing you had in mind ?
\documentclass {minimal}
\usepackage {fontspec}
\setmainfont {Linux Libertine O}
\begin {document}
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
I read somewhere that Linux Libertine developers are working on an
OpenType math font, may be there is a beta release somewhere.
Not yet!
Maybe in some weeks a alpha version.
By
Michael
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
Am 29.12.2010 um 10:14 schrieb François Patte:
I was wondering if there would be some fonts feature like:
[Numbers=OldStyle], one could imagine: [Numbers=MathNumbers]
MathNumbers can be found in the Supplementary Multilingual Plane
(SMP) at U+1D400...1D7FF.
--
Greetings
Pete
Hi,
I could have used array instead of longtable but, it is not handy to
write normal text within the mathematical mode and I need to mix both...
the package array helps. it defines the {} and {} column modifiers
for tabular environments:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{fontspec}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I would like to know why the numbers are different if typed with or
without the $ sign:
Using \setmainfont{Linux Libertine O} 7 is smaller than $7$
Is it possible to correct this? I want the same size (ie. $7$)
Of course I can always
Am 28.12.2010 um 11:06 schrieb François Patte:
Is it possible to correct this?
Yes: set up the maths font used for $7$ accordingly. (In TeX text and
maths fonts are different.)
Some like the difference of shape between a text 7 and and a maths 7.
If you are not among them, then simply
François Patte wrote:
Thanks for this answer. It is not too nice if you have to write:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
Bonjour, François : is this perhaps the sort of
thing you had in mind ?
\documentclass {minimal}
\usepackage {fontspec}
\setmainfont {Linux Libertine O}
\begin
Am 28.12.2010 um 19:44 schrieb François Patte:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
With XeTeX and fontspec loaded you also load xunicode. So you can
write as well:
Multiply 5 by 7: 7 \texttimes{} 5 = 35
Multiply 5 by 7: 7 × 5 = 35
I see another problem here: Is 5
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:44:42PM +0100, François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/12/2010 12:14, Peter Dyballa a écrit :
Am 28.12.2010 um 11:06 schrieb François Patte:
Is it possible to correct this?
Yes: set up the maths font used for $7$
And we can dub this, um, let me see, ... ActiveteX. :-)
2010/12/28 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk
François Patte wrote:
Thanks for this answer. It is not too nice if you have to write:
Multiply 5 by 7: $7\times 5 = 35$
Bonjour, François : is this perhaps the
20 matches
Mail list logo
