Re: [XeTeX] are the intercharclasses mentioned in interchar.pdf correct?

2017-03-27 Thread David Carlisle
On 27 March 2017 at 19:37, jfbu wrote: > .. ah, I don't think I'd noticed xetex was using _quite_ so many digits in its version number:-) as you say the test is a bit suspect but it works in the one case it needs to work so D guess it's OK! David

Re: [XeTeX] are the intercharclasses mentioned in interchar.pdf correct?

2017-03-27 Thread jfbu
Le 27 mars 2017 à 18:36, David Carlisle a écrit : > For newer xetex the package needs to be updated for the larger range, > the test used in teh latex format > > is > > \ifdim\the\XeTeXversion\XeTeXrevision\p@>0.3\p@ > \chardef\e@alloc@intercharclass@top=4095 >

Re: [XeTeX] are the intercharclasses mentioned in interchar.pdf correct?

2017-03-27 Thread Mike "Pomax" Kamermans
On 3/27/2017 9:36 AM, David Carlisle wrote: \ifdim\the\XeTeXversion\XeTeXrevision\p@>0.3\p@ \chardef\e@alloc@intercharclass@top=4095 \else \chardef\e@alloc@intercharclass@top=255 \fi nice, cheers - Mike -- Subscriptions, Archive,

Re: [XeTeX] are the intercharclasses mentioned in interchar.pdf correct?

2017-03-27 Thread David Carlisle
On 27 March 2017 at 17:18, Mike "Pomax" Kamermans wrote: > Are the predefined classes from > http://mirror.utexas.edu/ctan/macros/xetex/latex/interchar/interchar.pdf > still correct? are classes 255 (for boundary) and 256 (for unused) still the > right ones, are those