RE: [XFree86] intallation troubleshot with a ATI rage 128 agp on a debian

2003-07-17 Thread Damian Kokowski
Hi Martin, First test your X, like that: X -configure Then change that new config... I'have radeon, so it's ATI too :-) You can see my conf here: http://deimos.one.pl/ftp/conf/ Take care. P.S. There is something like DRI, and DRM for radeon, so you can check is this for

Re: [XFree86] Couldn't start x-window

2003-06-03 Thread Damian Kokowski
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:33:02AM -0400, Ravi wrote: I am using redhat 7.1 Linux. I am suddenly unable to start my X-windows and the log file is attached herewith. Please help me. First, install new version of X, then type X -configure, make some changes in your new config file, thats all.

Re: [XFree86] R250

2003-03-17 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Aleksandar Simonovski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: That's my config: http://deimos.one.pl/ftp/conf/XF86Config_xfree86-4.3.0 can you please send the XF86Config file by mail because i can get it from the link (connection timeout) On the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uptime 9:40am up 20

Re: [XFree86] ATI Radeon 9000 (rv250If) vs DRM, DRI...

2003-03-13 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Yang Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I didnt' try framebuffer, just used dri Uuuughhh.., thats wrong :-) Look here: http://deimos.one.pl/ftp/radeonfb/ (it's works fine with 2.4.20-ac2, because there're some hacks in radeonfb, DRM, etc... {you don't need to change /dev/ttyX after setting

Re: [XFree86] [XFree86(TM) Bug Report] tdfx OpenGL buggy on screen edges

2003-03-13 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Nick Gazaloff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I use DRI driver for 3dfx from stock kernel 2.4.21-pre5. I tried the driver from XFree86 4.3.0 source, but the bug stayed there... You use the DRM (CONFIG_DRM) and prabably the (CONFIG_DRM_TDFX), so if thats bed idea, you can: - use new _DRM_ and

Re: [XFree86] desktop panel

2003-03-13 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Darnell, Charles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The KDE desktop startup panel just disappears randomly? ROTFL Go to the KDE Mailing-List, or some ../local/* guru ;-) -- # Damian *dEiMoS* Kokowski # http://deimos.one.pl/ # ___ XFree86 mailing list

Re: [XFree86] ATI Radeon 9000 (rv250If) vs DRM, DRI...

2003-03-13 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Yang Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: oh I see, I set the CONFIG_FB_VESA=y, but CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m that might be the problem, I'll give it a try, Thanks ! :-) So remove CONFIG_FB_VESA :-) is your 3D acceleration working? No. I have via-kt-400 and that is prabably some trouble :-( Even

Re: [XFree86] ATI radeon kernel version mismatch

2003-03-13 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Philippe Moutarlier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but version 1.5.0 or newer is needed. [dri] Disabling DRI. DRM - in kernel you have DRM (CONFIG_DRM_RADEON). DRI is in the X. I am confused there : is the kernel module supplied by Xfree86 ? In

[XFree86] ATI Radeon 9000 (rv250If) vs DRM, DRI...

2003-03-12 Thread Damian Kokowski
Hi, I'am wondering those ATI Radeon 9000 (rv250If) graphic card works with DRI (Hardware acceleration like with fglrx ATI driver for 4.{1|2}.x) on X Window System (version 4.3.0). P.S. That's my hardware: - via_kt-400 - radeon rv250If System: - Slackware GNU/Linux (current) - X-4.3.0 -

Re: [XFree86] ATI Radeon 9000 (rv250If) vs DRM, DRI...

2003-03-12 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Ian Romanick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Update to the latest version of UT2k3. It drops the requirement for S3TC support. Heh... That's not the right solution. ut2003 was only the _test_ to se difference from _fglrx_ and new _ati_ driver from X-4.3.0. The _ati_ driver, DRI, and DRM from

Re: [XFree86] ATI Radeon 9000 (rv250If) vs DRM, DRI...

2003-03-12 Thread Damian Kokowski
* Yang Yang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I wasted a lot of time on this, I think the fglrx works OK with XF86 4.2, but doesn't work with 4.3, when I use the radeon driver from 4.3, there's no 3D acceleration, and TV-out doesn't work, Yep I know ;- ATI know that to - so I wrote to them...