Lotto Claims

2004-03-22 Thread pascalkollo
Looking for a fine girl to marry

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: (patch seq: 6202) XFree86-4.4.0 -- IPv6 support causes serious problems

2004-03-22 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote:

 OK.  I've committed this.  Perhaps someone else will step up to fix the
 remaining problems.

Hi Marc Aurele,

1. meanwhile I have done some testing and debugging (with some extra Debug(...)
statements in order to narrow down the problem). The result is an additional
patch (both are attached). With the two patches the IPv6 enabled chooser, xdm,
and XFree86 server work together quite well on a linux system without IPv6
support from the kernel. Each of the two patches begins with some comments.

There are still some warnings but with those we can live. Most of them will
probably disappear with '-nolisten inet6' and with a LISTEN statement in the
xdm config file.

Note: The change in xdmcp.c(NetworkAddressToHostname) is quite a kludge, but
somehow I got tired to further nail down what goes wrong. There is a comment
in the code to that effect and explaining exactly what went wrong. Unless
some brave soul fixes that, the modified code should probably be reformatted
(different indentation do to an additional brace level). Honestly I was just
too lazy to do that.

2. In browsing through xc/programs/xdm/*.c in noticed something strange:

xc/programs/xdm/xdmcp.c declares and uses both chooserFd and chooserFd6.

xc/programs/xdm/socket.c however creates just chooserFd as either an INET6 or
INET socket, thus chooserFd6 keeps it's initial value -1 and none of
the chooserFd6 related code in xdmcp.c will ever be executed.

It seems that originally there were plans to have two distinct sockets that
were abandonned in the middle. Maybe that ought to be cleaned up (fairly
trivial mods in xdmcp.c, just excise chooserFd6).

regards
Peter Breitenlohner [EMAIL PROTECTED]This patch fixes some (but not all) problems arising if
XFree86 is compiled with IPv6 support, but the (linux) kernel
does not support IPv6.

1. chooser segfaults: fixed.

2. xdm fails with chooser socket creation failed and consequently
no Xserver is started: fixed.

3. xdm fails to accept chooser connections: NOT fixed.

With these changes we can use the IPv6 enabled xdm for local logins,
but not in connection with a chooser.

The chooser compiled with IPv6 support works fine together with
xdm compiled without IPv6 support.

diff -ur -N XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/chooser.c 
XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/chooser.c
--- XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/chooser.c   2003-11-23 23:57:31.0 +0100
+++ XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/chooser.c2004-03-08 08:59:09.0 +0100
@@ -856,6 +856,7 @@
 XtAddInput (socketFD, (XtPointer) XtInputReadMask, ReceivePacket,
(XtPointer) socketFD);
 #if defined(IPv6)  defined(AF_INET6)
+if (socket6FD != -1)
 XtAddInput (socket6FD, (XtPointer) XtInputReadMask, ReceivePacket,
(XtPointer) socket6FD);
 #endif
diff -ur -N XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c 
XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c
--- XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c2003-11-25 23:21:08.0 +0100
+++ XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c 2004-03-08 09:32:36.0 +0100
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@
 
 #if defined(IPv6)  defined(AF_INET6)
 chooserFd = socket (AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
-#else
-chooserFd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+if (chooserFd == -1)
 #endif
+chooserFd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
 Debug (Created chooser socket %d\n, chooserFd);
 if (chooserFd == -1)
 {
This patch fixes the remaining problems arising if XFree86 is
compiled with IPv6 support, but the (linux) kernel does not
support IPv6. This patch is to be applied on top of patch-15-IPv6.

Note: The original code for UpdateListener in xc/programs/xdm/socket.c
could not possibly work for addr == NULL || addr-length == 0
because in resp. in6 were used outside the domain of validity of
these structures.

Similarly all_query_respond in xc/programs/xdm/xdmcp.c couldn't
possibly work due to some FamilyInternet(6) vs. AF_INET(6) confusion.

diff -ur -N XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/auth.c XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/auth.c
--- XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/auth.c  2004-01-16 01:03:54.0 +0100
+++ XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/auth.c   2004-03-21 16:24:04.0 +0100
@@ -1182,9 +1182,9 @@
 #ifdef TCPCONN
 #if defined(IPv6)  defined(AF_INET6)
 fd = socket (AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
-#else
-fd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+if (fd == -1)
 #endif
+fd = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
 DefineSelf (fd, file, auth);
 close (fd);
 #endif
diff -ur -N XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c 
XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c
--- XF86-4.4.0.orig/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c2004-03-08 09:32:36.0 +0100
+++ XF86-4.4.0/xc/programs/xdm/socket.c 2004-03-22 16:28:48.0 +0100
@@ -298,22 +298,24 @@
 UpdateListener(ARRAY8Ptr addr, void 

[PATCH] Make MAXSCREENS run-time configurable

2004-03-22 Thread Rik Faith
[I posted this last Monday, but it got held for moderation because it
was slightly over 100KB with the patch uncompressed.  I've compressed
the patch for this posting. --Rik Faith]

Throughout the DMX (dmx.sf.net) work, we have been submitting patches
for bug fixes and/or self-contained code as we finish them.  Towards
that goal, a patch is attached below.  It has also been entered into the
XFree86 bugzilla database as #1269:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269

Rik Faith and Kevin Martin
 
==

The following patch changes MAXSCREENS from a #define to an int.  The
patch is against the XFree86 CVS repository.

The goals of the patch are as follows:
1) Allow MAXSCREENS to be determined at run time instead of compile
   time (a new -maxscreens command line flag was added).
2) Make minimal source-code changes to the tree:
   a) The name MAXSCREENS was not changed -- this allowed all of
  the loops that reference MAXSCREENS to remain unchanged.
   b) MAXSCREENSALLOC is a convenience macro that allocates and
  zeros memory, allowing 1-line changes to allocate code (and
  another line to check that allocation succeeded).  Memory is
  zero'd because many routines assume that the previous static
  allocations are zero'd.  The macro is also safe to call
  multiple times since there are places in the code where the
  first use of a MAXSCREENS-sized array is difficult to
  determine (or non-deterministic).
   c) In some cases, the existing code zeros the memory.  These
  calls are unchanged, but could be removed.

The patch has been tested using xtest, and the results from the XFree86
4.4 tree with and without the patch are identical.

Some of the changes could not be tested because we do not have the
appropriate hardware available -- it would be possible to substitute
MAXSCREENSDEFAULT for MAXSCREENS in these code paths (i.e., and leave
them as compile-time configurable code paths):
config/cf/iPAQH3600.cf
config/cf/itsy.cf
programs/Xserver/hw/darwin/quartz/fullscreen/fullscreen.c
programs/Xserver/hw/kdrive/kxv.c
programs/Xserver/hw/sun/sunInit.c
programs/Xserver/hw/sunLynx/sunLyInit.c
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/* [all the changes are similar]
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/arm_video.c
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/dgux/dgux_video.c
programs/Xserver/hw/xwin/InitOutput.c

The diffstat is below, followed by the patch.

==

 config/cf/iPAQH3600.cf  |2 
 config/cf/itsy.cf   |2 
 programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/src/X/xf86glx.c|6 
 programs/Xserver/Xext/appgroup.c|   13 +
 programs/Xserver/Xext/mbufbf.c  |   19 +-
 programs/Xserver/Xext/panoramiX.c   |   15 +
 programs/Xserver/Xext/panoramiX.h   |2 
 programs/Xserver/Xext/panoramiXprocs.c  |  107 +---
 programs/Xserver/Xext/panoramiXsrv.h|2 
 programs/Xserver/Xext/shm.c |   29 ++-
 programs/Xserver/Xext/xf86dga2.c|3 
 programs/Xserver/Xext/xprint.c  |4 
 programs/Xserver/Xext/xvdisp.c  |8 
 programs/Xserver/dbe/dbe.c  |5 
 programs/Xserver/dix/cursor.c   |   69 +++
 programs/Xserver/dix/dispatch.c |9 +
 programs/Xserver/dix/events.c   |3 
 programs/Xserver/dix/extension.c|5 
 programs/Xserver/dix/globals.c  |2 
 programs/Xserver/dix/main.c |   45 -
 programs/Xserver/dix/window.c   |2 
 programs/Xserver/fb/fbcmap.c|   11 -
 programs/Xserver/hw/darwin/quartz/fullscreen/fullscreen.c   |   10 +
 programs/Xserver/hw/kdrive/kxv.c|4 
 programs/Xserver/hw/sun/sunInit.c   |   14 +
 programs/Xserver/hw/sunLynx/sunLyInit.c |6 
 programs/Xserver/hw/vfb/InitOutput.c|8 
 programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Cursor.c |   64 +++
 programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86xv.c |3 
 programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/r128_dga.c  |4 
 programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_dga.c|4 
 programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/chips/ct_dga.c  |4 
 programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/cirrus/cir_dga.c|4 
 

NS: Legenda Publicitária (Tecnologia brasileira)

2004-03-22 Thread Juliano - Dpto. Marketing
Pessoal,

Ai vai um convite para quem gosta de tecnologia. Desenvolvemos uma solução
100% brasileira que transforma um simples aparelho de celular comum em uma
poderosa ferramenta de trabalho com comunicação em tempo real. Dentro de
nossas soluções podemos citar:

RTC - Ferramenta para automação de força de vendas.
RTVM - Sistema para controle de propagandistas para laboratórios
farmacêuticos.
RTM - Sistema para transportadoras de valores, bancos e abastecimento de
ATMs.

Para conhecer acessem: www.realwireless.com.br

Um Abraço,

Juliano Carneiro.
(Diretor - Real Wireless)

OBS: Esta mensagem não é um spam, visto que somente estará sendo enviada
uma única vez, e também contém uma forma de ser removida opt-out. Caso
queira remover definitivamente seu endereço de nossa lista, basta
responder este e-mail com o titulo (assunto) remover. Respeitamos a sua
vontade e nossos mecanismos de opt-out são funcionais.

A Real Wireless agradece sua compreensão. 


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[I18n] 80%_D1scounts_V1aggra_C1al1s_Pro.zakk!!![23] Chea.pest_Prices!!! [quietus]

2004-03-22 Thread Branden Spence


Directors and actresses speak candidly about body image, nude scenes, age and the tendency to glorify sex scenes.
The Labor Department said 336,000 people filed new claims for state unemployment benefits in the week ended March 13 compared with a revised 342,000 the prior week. 
The parliament, expected to evolve into the law-making arm of the AU, will provide a venue for debates on matters such as human rights, democracy, culture and good governance.





WASHINGTON, D.C.—A new General Accounting Office (GAO) report examining the impact of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) 10 years after its enactment shows that the federal agencies have made steady improvement toward producing strategic plans, annual plans for the upcoming year, and then reporting on their success in meeting those goals.
The TSA also wants to use the program to catch violent criminals, which it says is a way to safeguard air passengers. But May said that will take the focus of the program away from the TSA's mandate to prevent terrorism. 
The United States has enjoyed nine straight quarters of growth, including the strongest performance in 20 years in the third quarter of 2003, without significant job creation. 
The Labor Department said 336,000 people filed new claims for state unemployment benefits in the week ended March 13 compared with a revised 342,000 the prior week. 




[I18n] UTF-8 ICCCM properties

2004-03-22 Thread Markus Kuhn
Juliusz wrote in

  http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/UTF8_STRING/UTF8_STRING.text

 In the interest of interoperability, the semantics of the selection
 target TEXT are *not* changed; in particular, replying with a
 selection type of type UTF8_STRING to a request specifying TEXT is
 explicitly *not* allowed.

Question: That was mostly in the context of how to handle xterm-style
cutpaste selections. What about the window manager property types

  WM_CLIENT_MACHINE
  WM_ICON_NAME
  WM_NAME

which are all specified in the ICCCM as type TEXT. If we exclude
UTF8_STRING from being used where a type TEXT is specified, we will have
no portable way of using Unicode in windows titles and icon names.

Why can't we just jump into the cold water by adding UTF8_STRING to the
list of encodings allowed to be used when then polymorphic type TEXT is
used, with the simple restriction that STRING must be used whenever all
the character of the string are contained in Latin-1?

I understand that it may break temporarily a few things if the
originator of a property uses UTF8_STRING and the recipient does not yet
understand it. But in practice, isn't that just the same situation as we
had when COMPOUND_TEXT was added in 1991 and C_STRING was added in 1993,
two types that even today are still not supported by most applications.

The only alternatives I could think of are all a bit ugly, such as
adding

  WM_CLIENT_MACHINE_UTF8
  WM_ICON_NAME_UTF8
  WM_NAME_UTF8

all of type UTF8_STRING.

Opinions?

Markus

-- 
Markus Kuhn, Computer Lab, Univ of Cambridge, GB
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ | __oo_O..O_oo__

___
I18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n


Re: [XFree86] a Xfree86 bug

2004-03-22 Thread Edouard Debry
I gave the option mem=nopentium at boot and it seemed to have solved
the instability with AGP ( the internal AGP driver of nvidia ), 
I say only seemed because there is no more freeze events in the first
minutes after boot, and Xfree86 log says that nvidia internal agp has
been successfully initialized,

this advice was given in nvidia's notice, I have not tried it with
agpgart yet,

I am curious to understand what mem=nopentium acutally does
and where was the instability

thanks for your help

edouard


On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 11:18:56AM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
 On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Edouard Debry wrote:
 
  I turned off AGP and there is no more problem (at least for now),
  but is it definitely impossible to use AGP ? what is wrong with AGP ?
 
 
   There's either a bug in the AGP suport for that chipset in either
 AGPGART or NVGART depending on which you are using.  Or it could
 be a 2.6 specific bug in NVIDIA's drivers with respect to AGP.
 
 
   Mark.
 
-- 
*-*
|  Edouard DEBRY  |
| Ph-D student at E.N.P.C - C.E.R.E.A   http://www.enpc.fr/cerea/ |
| |
| 21 Rue Nobel, Cité DescartesTEL  : 33 1 64 15 21 52 |
| 77455 CHAMPS SUR MARNE  MAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
| |
| Thesis subject: MODELING OF AN ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL DISTRIBUTION |
*-*
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Re: lol [Authorize]

2004-03-22 Thread glennf

Hi, 
You just 
sent an email to my [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
account, which is now being managed by my Mailblocks spam-free email service. 
 (If you didnt recently send a message to me, please see the Note below*.)
		Because this is the first time you have sent to this email account, please confirm yourself so you'll be recognized when you send to me in the future. 

It's 
simple.To prove your message comes from a human and not a computer, go 
to:http://app4.mailblocks.com/confirm2.aspx?ck=BmdsZW5uZg5tYWlsYmxvY2tzLmNvbRN4ZnJlZTg2QHhmcmVlODYub3JnwtqlqQ**=1 

This is the 
email message you have sent that is in my Pending folder waiting for your quick 
authentication: 


  
Subject:
lol
  
Sent:
Mar 22, 1:51 AM
		If you have not confirmed within several days, your message will automatically be deleted.
Personal Message:Please don't send email to me at this outdated address. Search on my name on Google to find my new Web site, which lists that address.

*Note: If you did not send the above message to me, and you would like to report this email as unwanted, please notify Mailblocks by clicking here, and we will ensure that you do not receive any further notification regarding the above message.  Mailblocks investigates all reports made using this link.
			-
		Email for Humans... Mailblocks
Try Mailblocks web-based personal email -- faster, cleaner interface, more storage, bigger attachments, and 100% spam-free. 
About Mailblocks
		(c) 2004 Mailblocks Inc. All rights reserved.



	

[XFree86] -

2004-03-22 Thread








[XFree86] Getting information about resources

2004-03-22 Thread Jan
This may seem totally irrelevant to this list, but I hope I can persuade
you that this isn't the case.

I am trying to install Oracle 9.2 on a Linux/390. The Oracle installer
has for some time been some Java contraption that insists on running on
X, and this often causes me problems. In this case the installer starts
up, displays a dialog box with some text etc; the problem here is that
the text is invisible. In other dialogs the text shows, but in a font
that is totally crooked - eg. all upper case letters hang below the line
(unless it is the lower case letters that fly above it). I can select
the invisible text in some of the input fields and copy it to eg. an
xterm, so I know the text is there.

So why would the text be invisible? In my mind it must be either that
the font doesn't contain glyphs for those characters, or the foreground
colour is set to the same as the background.

Of course Oracle are not inclined to help - I use the wrong version of
SuSE, which I believe is clearly rubbish, but good enough as an excuse,
I suppose. So I think what I have to do is find out which X resources
the installer uses, especially which fonts and colours - is there a
command for that, similar to xset?

/jan

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] x server crash

2004-03-22 Thread Peter Brunner
my x-server crashes every time i start kde or xfce4. CPU cycles at 99.0%. i   
have gentoo with 2.6.3-gentoo-r1 kernel, but there was the same error with the   
2.6.4 kernel. I have an nvidia geforce 4 440 MX (i think). Could you help me?   
   
thanx and greetings 
 
Peter Brunner   
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Log file

2004-03-22 Thread Ganapathy Ramasubramanian

Hi,

 This is my first attempt at installing linux and I am running into problems installing X-Windows. I have attached the log file that I got. My video card is a 128 DDR ATI Radeon 9700. It anyone has any suggestions please let me know.

Thanks,
Guppy.Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.

XFREE86.0
Description: XFREE86.0


[XFree86] x server crash under gentoo with nvidia geforce 4

2004-03-22 Thread Peter Brunner
hi, my server crashes every time i start kde or xfce4. I emerged the newest  
xfree-package but the problem always exists. the cpu goes to 99%. i use gentoo  
with kernel 2.6.3 and 2.6.4 but i have the problem in both. my graphic card is  
nvidia geforce 4 mx. here is my xfree86.log  
  
  
  
  
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Problem getting xfree to work ( on gentoo )

2004-03-22 Thread David Eduardo Gomez Noguera
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 22:09, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
   The GeForceFX 5700 is technically not supported by the nv driver
 prior to XFree86 4.4.  XFree86 4.3's nv driver will try to treat it
 as an older card and start up anyhow, but in the case of the
 5700, that doesn't work (except for digital flat panels, where it
 kindof works).  It's works fine with XFree86 4.4.
 

   Mark.
 

Thank you.
That might be it. I have exatly FX5700 card. Dont remember exactly what
X version does gentoo tries to install, but I think thats it.

My Moderboard has an integrated intel video card (hope that works with
4.3's thoug ;) ). I will try to see if I can get both living happyly 
together (integrated video is dissabled now)

Uhm. What else could I do if gentoo has not updated its version? 
I think I need to read a bit more on its portage...

Thank you again for the pointer.

 On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, David Eduardo Gomez Noguera wrote:
 
  Hello. I have a running installation of Fedora and have just started to
  get used to gentoo, in another hard drive.
 

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Startx not working in RedHat 7.2 Linux

2004-03-22 Thread Rubiolo Jeronimo-ajr037
Title: Message



Hi All, I have 
updated to the latest kde package version in a RH 7.2 and since the upgrade I'm 
getting the following error message when running startx:

Fatal server 
error:could not open default font 'fixed'

I have XFree86 
4.1.0-3 installed.

What I tried so far 
was to upgrade to a newer version of XFree86 (4.1.0-50) but I'm requiered to 
upgrade Mesa to 3.4.2-10 version (I have 3.4.2-7 currently installed). When I 
tried to upgrade Mesa, I'm asked to upgrade XFree86 4.1.0-14 or greater. I'm in 
adependcy loop.

Does anybody know 
how to solve this problem?

Regards,

Jerónimo 
Rubiolo.


Re: [XFree86] Re: SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 Value Detected as VGA Device:

2004-03-22 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote:

   I am using the latest BIOS for my machine, a DELL Dimension XPS R400.
   The BIOS version is A13, the newest thing from Dell's website. Albiet,
   it was created in 1999, but it's the newest they have.

   There is no onboard video on my motherboard - the second video device
   the X-server thinks it found is the SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 Value card
   (CT4830). There are no video ports on the sound card, just 4 audio jacks
   and a MIDI/Joystick port. Proof of this list error is found by running
   lspci, which says the SB Live! is a VGA Compatible Unclassified
   Device. Here's the output from that:

  That sounds like a motherboard BIOS bug then, or a bug with the
  SB Live card's PCI config space.

 It's b).  Creator is notorious for producing adapters that mis-advertise
 their PCI type as 00/01 (prehistoric VGA) instead of 04/01 (multimedia
 audio).

I, of course, meant Creative, not Creator.

 Also, the motherboard BIOS has no way of overriding these types.

  Adding:

BusID PCI:0:13:0

  to the Section Device will force the ATI driver to use the
  correct card.  Hopfully XFree86's RAC support isn't confused by
  the two VGA compatible devices.

 That helps, certainly, but by then, this hardware bug has already caused
 us to not mark the Radeon as the primary adapter.  This causes an attempt
 to re-initialise the Radeon, which is not a good idea due to a separate
 bug in its BIOS.

 This'll require a code change to fix.  But I'm not sure what the
 best way to fix this is.  There's a mechanism in the server to override
 advertised PCI types, but it's not pervasive, affecting only certain
 areas.  Anyway, I'll look into it.

 In the meantime, I'd suggest ripping out the Creative, perhaps replacing
 with an adapter that doesn't display this problem.

It turns out there's a straightforward workaround for this problem.  As
root, do ...

cd /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
cp libpcidata.a libpcidata.backup
cp libscanpci.a libpcidata.a

... and stop and restart the X server.  The BusID specification should
then be unnecessary (as would removing the Sound Blaster adapter).

Marc.

+--+---+
|  Marc Aurele La France   |  work:   1-780-492-9310   |
|  Computing and Network Services  |  fax:1-780-492-1729   |
|  352 General Services Building   |  email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
|  University of Alberta   +---+
|  Edmonton, Alberta   |   |
|  T6G 2H1 | Standard disclaimers apply|
|  CANADA  |   |
+--+---+
XFree86 developer and VP.  ATI driver and X server internals.

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Log file

2004-03-22 Thread Pieter Hulshoff
On Monday 22 March 2004 14:28, Ganapathy Ramasubramanian wrote:
This is my first attempt at installing linux and I am running into
 problems installing X-Windows. I have attached the log file that I got. My
 video card is a 128 DDR ATI Radeon 9700. It anyone has any suggestions
 please let me know.

Upgrade your version of XFree86, for the Radeon 9700 is not supported in 
4.1.x. You might even want to consider upgrading your Linux distribution.

Regards,

Pieter Hulshoff
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] E-mail account security warning.

2004-03-22 Thread Joseph Pesco
Hi Folks;

 Is this warning for real? This is the second warning of this natureI've recieved. The first one I deleted without much thought, and I didn't notice any ill effects on the e-mail account itself. I really, really,--- really hate to say this, (long pause intended,) but, I've been out of the loop for several years, andat the momentI don't haveaccess to the type of equipment required to propertlysatisfy mycurosity about suchthings. 
  
Yours truly,
-joe






















To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject:
 [XFree86] E-mail account security warning.

Date:
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:20:08 -0500





 




Dear user of XFree86.org e-mail server gateway,Your e-mail account will be disabled because of improper using in next three days, if you are still wishing to use it, please, resign your account information.For details see the attach.In order to read the attach you have to use the following password: Sincerely,  The XFree86.org team http://www.XFree86.org 








Attachment














Scan and Download AttachmentScan and Save to my Yahoo! Photos 








Attachment














Scan and Download AttachmentScan and Save to my Yahoo! Briefcase 

The HTML graphics in this message have been blocked.[Show HTML Graphics - Edit Preferences]Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.

[XFree86] Xconfigurator help

2004-03-22 Thread Alan Pike
Being realtively new to Linux I recently messed up the nice configration job 
that the Tech guys at RackSaver put together for me in such a short notice. 
Seriously.

I recently tried to change my monitor settigns using x86config and now after 
logging off and out of my session I get a fatal X server error. After 
working with what I think is every possible combination of  monitor and card 
settings I still get this. So now I am seeking help.

My config is as follows:

Red Hat 7.3 on a Rack Saver RS1100 with the ATI Rage XL onboard video with 
an OLD Supermatch 17 monitor.

My error is as follows:

(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(==) ATI(0): Chipset:  ati.
(EE) ATI(0): No Display subsection in Screen section Screen0 for 
depth/fbbpp 8/8
(II) UnloadModule: ati
(II) UnloadModule: atimisc
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.

Fatal server error:
no screens found
Has anyone or does anyone know of a correct Xconfigurator setting that can 
help me solve this problem?

Thanks a deal in advance.
cheers
--ap
_
Get reliable access on MSN 9 Dial-up. 3 months for the price of 1! 
(Limited-time offer) http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Re: SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 Value Detected as VGA Device:

2004-03-22 Thread Andrew D.
After reading your e-mail, Marc, I instantly rebooted from Win98 (where 
I'm reading this info) to Mandrake Linux's Failsafe. I logged in a root, 
edited my XF86Config-4 file and commented out the PCIbus line. I 
closed that down, and followed your instructions for replacing the 
libpcidata.a file with my libscanpci.a file. After that, I rebooted my 
machine. Upon starting Mandrake 10 normally, I was given the following 
error by my X-Server:

(EE) LoadModule: Module pcidata does not have a pcidataModuleData data 
object.

Attached is the new log file. Thanks so much for your input and your 
quick responses. If only Microsoft gave tech support this quickly.

~~ Andrew

Marc Aurele La France wrote:

It turns out there's a straightforward workaround for this problem.  As
root, do ...
cd /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
cp libpcidata.a libpcidata.backup
cp libscanpci.a libpcidata.a
... and stop and restart the X server.  The BusID specification should
then be unnecessary (as would removing the Sound Blaster adapter).
Marc.



This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way.  Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository
(http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs).

XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1
Release Date: 15 August 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.0-1mdkenterprise i686 [ELF] 
Build Date: 01 March 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Mon Mar 22 13:13:25 2004
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
(==) ServerLayout layout1
(**) |--Screen screen1 (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor monitor1
(**) |   |--Device device1
(**) |--Input Device Keyboard1
(**) Option XkbModel pc105
(**) XKB: model: pc105
(**) Option XkbLayout en_US
(**) XKB: layout: en_US
(WW) Option XkbOptions requires an string value
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled
(**) |--Input Device Mouse1
(**) FontPath set to unix/:-1
(==) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
(==) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
(**) Option AllowMouseOpenFail
Using vt 7
(--) using VT number 7

(II) Open APM successful
(II) Module ABI versions:
XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2
XFree86 Video Driver: 0.6
XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4
XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2
XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4
(II) Loader running on linux
(II) LoadModule: bitmap
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: pcidata
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(EE) LoadModule: Module pcidata does not have a pcidataModuleData data object.
(II) UnloadModule: pcidata
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(EE) Failed to load module pcidata (invalid module, 0)

Fatal server error:
Unable to load required base modules, Exiting...


When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages.
This can be found in the log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log.
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[XFree86] flog me if you want to

2004-03-22 Thread Joseph Pesco
hi,
The security warnings are the real? And, what is a rar file. 
I've been out of the loop for a while :)

jpesco
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.

Re: [XFree86] Problem getting xfree to work ( on gentoo )

2004-03-22 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi,

Am Montag, 22. März 2004 14:57 schrieb David Eduardo Gomez Noguera:
 On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 22:09, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
The GeForceFX 5700 is technically not supported by the nv driver
  prior to XFree86 4.4.  XFree86 4.3's nv driver will try to treat it
  as an older card and start up anyhow, but in the case of the
  5700, that doesn't work (except for digital flat panels, where it
  kindof works).  It's works fine with XFree86 4.4.
 
 
  Mark.

 Thank you.
 That might be it. I have exatly FX5700 card. Dont remember exactly what
 X version does gentoo tries to install, but I think thats it.

 My Moderboard has an integrated intel video card (hope that works with
 4.3's thoug ;) ). I will try to see if I can get both living happyly
 together (integrated video is dissabled now)

 Uhm. What else could I do if gentoo has not updated its version?
 I think I need to read a bit more on its portage...

 Thank you again for the pointer.

there's an ebuild +  instructions available at:
http://media.homelinux.org/gentoo
Gentoo will not include 4.4.0 in portage because of license issues they have. 
I use the ebuild above on various machines and it works perfectly.

HTH,
Michael

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] E-mail account security warning.

2004-03-22 Thread David Dawes
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 11:19:50AM -0800, Joseph Pesco wrote:
Hi Folks;
 
Is this warning for real?  This is the second warning of this nature I've 
 recieved.  The first one I deleted without much thought, and I didn't notice any ill 
 effects on the e-mail account itself.  I really, really, --- really hate to say 
 this,  (long pause intended,)  but, I've been out of the loop for several years, and 
 at the moment I don't have access to the type of equipment required to propertly 
 satisfy my curosity about such things. 

It is not for real.  It looks like something intended to scam
account/password information, or to trick people into opening a
virus-infected attachment.

David

   
Yours truly,
-joe 
 
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [XFree86] E-mail account security 
warning.Date:Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:20:08 -0500
Dear user of XFree86.org e-mail server gateway,

Your e-mail account will be disabled because of improper using in next 
three days, if you are still wishing to use it, please, resign your 
account information.

For details see the attach.

In order to read the attach you have to use the following password: 

Sincerely,
The XFree86.org team http://www.XFree86.org 


  Attachment  
Scan and Download Attachment
Scan and Save to my Yahoo! Photos 




  Attachment   

Scan and Download Attachment
Scan and Save to my Yahoo! Briefcase 


 The HTML graphics in this message have been blocked. [Show HTML Graphics - Edit 
 Preferences]

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Xconfigurator help

2004-03-22 Thread Pieter Hulshoff
On Monday 22 March 2004 20:52, Alan Pike wrote:
 (EE) ATI(0): No Display subsection in Screen section Screen0 for
 depth/fbbpp 8/8

Looks like you deleted part of your Screen section (the Display subsection to 
be precise). I'll give you mine to give you an idea of what one might look 
like (don't be overwhelmed by the amount of resolutions I specified; I use 
xmame:):

Section Screen
  DefaultDepth 24
  SubSection Display
Depth  15
Modes  1024x768 
  EndSubSection
  SubSection Display
Depth  16
Modes  1600x1200 1600x1024 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x960 
1152x864 1024x768 800x600 640x480 224x256 240x256 256x256 
256x304 248x320 248x368 248x384 320x200 224x224 256x224 
288x224 320x224 304x224 256x240 292x240 320x240 336x240 
384x240 360x288 360x256 400x300 400x256 400x224 512x384 
640x240 672x240 320x224 384x224 794x512
  EndSubSection
  SubSection Display
Depth  24
Modes  1600x1200 1600x1024 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x960 
1152x864 1024x768 800x600 640x480 224x256 240x256 256x256 
256x304 248x320 248x368 248x384 320x200 224x224 256x224 
288x224 320x224 304x224 256x240 292x240 320x240 336x240 
384x240 360x288 360x256 400x300 400x256 400x224 512x384 
640x240 672x240 320x224 384x224 794x512
  EndSubSection
  SubSection Display
Depth  32
Modes  1600x1200 1600x1024 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x960 
1152x864 1024x768 800x600 640x480 224x256 240x256 256x256 
256x304 248x320 248x368 248x384 320x200 224x224 256x224 
288x224 320x224 304x224 256x240 292x240 320x240 336x240 
384x240 360x288 360x256 400x300 400x256 400x224 512x384 
640x240 672x240 320x224 384x224 794x512
  EndSubSection
  SubSection Display
Depth  8
Modes  1600x1200 1600x1024 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x960 
1152x864 1024x768 800x600 640x480 224x256 240x256 256x256 
256x304 248x320 248x368 248x384 320x200 224x224 256x224 
288x224 320x224 304x224 256x240 292x240 320x240 336x240 
384x240 360x288 360x256 400x300 400x256 400x224 512x384 
640x240 672x240 320x224 384x224 794x512
  EndSubSection
  Device   Device[0]
  Identifier   Screen[0]
  Monitor  Monitor[0]
EndSection
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] a Xfree86 bug

2004-03-22 Thread Mark Vojkovich
   My impression was that mem=nopentium was only applicable
to older kernels.  Basically, the large page extension on AMD
processors behaves differently than on Intel.  Linux kernel
did not properly support it (nor did Microsoft Windows, for that
matter).  I thought that newer 2.4 kernels had workarounds for
the Athlon, but mem=nopentium was required to disable the broken
support altogether on older kernels.  Perhaps this is a regression
in 2.6.


Mark.


On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Edouard Debry wrote:

 I gave the option mem=nopentium at boot and it seemed to have solved
 the instability with AGP ( the internal AGP driver of nvidia ),
 I say only seemed because there is no more freeze events in the first
 minutes after boot, and Xfree86 log says that nvidia internal agp has
 been successfully initialized,

 this advice was given in nvidia's notice, I have not tried it with
 agpgart yet,

 I am curious to understand what mem=nopentium acutally does
 and where was the instability

 thanks for your help

 edouard


 On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 11:18:56AM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
  On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Edouard Debry wrote:
 
   I turned off AGP and there is no more problem (at least for now),
   but is it definitely impossible to use AGP ? what is wrong with AGP ?
 
 
There's either a bug in the AGP suport for that chipset in either
  AGPGART or NVGART depending on which you are using.  Or it could
  be a 2.6 specific bug in NVIDIA's drivers with respect to AGP.
 
 
  Mark.
 
 --
 *-*
 |  Edouard DEBRY  |
 | Ph-D student at E.N.P.C - C.E.R.E.A   http://www.enpc.fr/cerea/ |
 | |
 | 21 Rue Nobel, Cité DescartesTEL  : 33 1 64 15 21 52 |
 | 77455 CHAMPS SUR MARNE  MAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
 | |
 | Thesis subject: MODELING OF AN ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL DISTRIBUTION |
 *-*
 ___
 XFree86 mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Re: SoundBlaster Live! 5.1 Value Detected as VGA Device:

2004-03-22 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Andrew D. wrote:

 After reading your e-mail, Marc, I instantly rebooted from Win98 (where
 I'm reading this info) to Mandrake Linux's Failsafe. I logged in a root,
 edited my XF86Config-4 file and commented out the PCIbus line. I
 closed that down, and followed your instructions for replacing the
 libpcidata.a file with my libscanpci.a file. After that, I rebooted my
 machine. Upon starting Mandrake 10 normally, I was given the following
 error by my X-Server:

 (EE) LoadModule: Module pcidata does not have a pcidataModuleData data
 object.

Doh!  Silly me...

 Attached is the new log file. Thanks so much for your input and your
 quick responses. If only Microsoft gave tech support this quickly.

 ~~ Andrew

 Marc Aurele La France wrote:

 It turns out there's a straightforward workaround for this problem.  As
 root, do ...

   cd /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
   cp libpcidata.a libpcidata.backup
   cp libscanpci.a libpcidata.a

Replace that last command with ...

sed 's/scanpci/pcidata/g'  libscanpci.a  libpcidata.a

(Good thing the two strings are the same length...)

 ... and stop and restart the X server.  The BusID specification should
 then be unnecessary (as would removing the Sound Blaster adapter).

Marc.

+--+---+
|  Marc Aurele La France   |  work:   1-780-492-9310   |
|  Computing and Network Services  |  fax:1-780-492-1729   |
|  352 General Services Building   |  email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
|  University of Alberta   +---+
|  Edmonton, Alberta   |   |
|  T6G 2H1 | Standard disclaimers apply|
|  CANADA  |   |
+--+---+
XFree86 developer and VP.  ATI driver and X server internals.

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] not enough video memory

2004-03-22 Thread Leo Tick
I have a video card with et600 and 4 megs of memory.
I have used it with XFree 3. But With 4.3 I get a rejection
of every mode with a say
II) TSENG(0): Not using default mode 640x480 (insufficient memory for 
mode)
What can I do??
I am using SUSE from SUN
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Nubus av Video Card

2004-03-22 Thread Renee
Dear XFree86,

• I am using XFree86 v. 4.2.0-6.30e, the version that came on my
install cd of linux.

• I am running Yellow Dog Linux 2.3 with the modified Mach Kernel from
the Nubus Powermac Linux Website.  (http://nubus-pmac.sourceforge.net/)

• I am running this all on a nubus power macintosh 7100/80 with an av
video card (sometimes known as an HPV card). 

• I only have 729 megabytes on my linux partition, so I had to install
a base install of ydl 2.3, and then install X manually.

Okay,
My problem is very unclear to me, because I have been able to get X
running on this machine before.  I have installed ydl 2.3 four times on
this machine, each time I had to erase the entire partition because I
messed things up.  but the first 2 times I had X running.   The first
time it took forever to get running and I am not even sure how I got it
up.  The second time, it worked without any coaxing or poking or
anything, it just worked.   The third time, it would not work, so I
reinstalled ydl 2.3, because it worked so miraculously well the second
time, so I thought installing it again must just work.  But now, the
fourth time around, it is giving me the same errors as the first and
third time, but since I do not know how I fixed it the first time, or
why it worked the second time, I don't know what to do.

I have included the log file and config file as attachments.  I
actually cannot open them on my mac os (8) side, so I am hoping they
will work for you.

Thank you

Renee

__ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

XF86Config-4
Description: XF86Config-4


XFree86.0.log
Description: XFree86.0.log


RE: [XFree86] E-mail account security warning.

2004-03-22 Thread Kenneth Lerman



My 
virus scanner quarantined that email saying it has a virus:

Attention: System Anti-Virus Administrator.
[This warning message is *not* being sent to the apparent 
originator
of the original message. This address appears to be that of 
a
mailing list or other automated email system.]
---
A virus was found in an Email message you sent. 
This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire 
message
reaching its destination. 
The virus was reported to be: 
Worm.Bagle.Gen-rarpwd

--

For what 
it's worth, I'm using clamscan. It's free, it's automatically updated, and 
it seems to work.

KL

Kenneth Lerman 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joseph 
  PescoSent: Monday, March 22, 2004 2:20 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [XFree86] E-mail account security 
  warning.
  Hi Folks;
  
   Is this warning for real? This is the second 
  warning of this natureI've recieved. The first one I deleted 
  without much thought, and I didn't notice any ill effects on the e-mail 
  account itself. I really, really,--- really hate to say 
  this, (long pause intended,) but, I've been out of the loop for 
  several years, andat the momentI don't haveaccess to the 
  type of equipment required to propertlysatisfy mycurosity about 
  suchthings. 

  Yours truly,
  -joe
  
  
  


  

  
  

  


  
  


  

  
  
  
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
Subject:
 [XFree86] 
  E-mail account security warning.
  
Date:
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:20:08 
  -0500
  


  
  
 

  
  


  Dear user of XFree86.org e-mail server 
gateway,Your e-mail account will be disabled because 
of improper using in next three days, if you are still 
wishing to use it, please, resign your account 
information.For details see the attach.In 
order to read the attach you have to use the following 
password: Sincerely,  The 
XFree86.org team   
  http://www.XFree86.org 


  
  

  


  Attachment
  
  

  




  

  


  
  Scan 
and Download 
AttachmentScan 
and Save to my Yahoo! Photos 



  
  

  


  Attachment
  
  

  




  

  


  
  Scan 
and Download 
AttachmentScan 
and Save to my Yahoo! Briefcase 


  The 
HTML graphics in this message have been blocked.[Show 
HTML Graphics - Edit 
Preferences]
  Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Finance Tax Center 
  - File online. File on time.


[XFree86] -

2004-03-22 Thread


!!!
  
.
, , .
  
   .
 
 .
 
  , .
(095) 782~`64~`54, 782~`64~`59
, .
   .







toiblsnykbcjnfvmtrfjrfonnkugnhearjjvcspfuykxiilvbjsynkqgtzwngsalolmnuneswircvgaxzuytdziincyjnrgebomfdnokyrwgruhn





Re: [XFree86] E-mail account security warning.

2004-03-22 Thread David Eduardo Gomez Noguera
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 13:19, Joseph Pesco wrote:
 Hi Folks;
  
 Is this warning for real?  This is the second warning of this
 nature I've recieved.  The first one I deleted without much thought,
 and I didn't notice any ill effects on the e-mail account itself.  I
 really, really, --- really hate to say this,  (long pause intended,) 
 but, I've been out of the loop for several years, and at the moment I
 don't have access to the type of equipment required to
 propertly satisfy my curosity about such things. 
I took the precaution to see what was in the rar (rar -l), and its an
exe file...

 Yours truly,
 -joe 
  
 
   To:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Subject:
  [XFree86] E-mail
 account security
 warning.
 Date:
 Mon, 22 Mar 2004
 10:20:08 -0500
 
 Dear user of XFree86.org e-mail server gateway,
 
 Your e-mail account will be disabled because of improper using in next
 three days, if you are still wishing to use it, please, resign your 
 account information.
 
 For details see the attach.
 
 In order to read the attach you have to use the following password: 
 
 Sincerely,
 The XFree86.org team http://www.XFree86.org
 
 

Attachment

  


  Scan and Download Attachment
   Scan and Save to my Yahoo! Photos
 
 
 

Attachment

  



  Scan and Download Attachment
   Scan and Save to my Yahoo!
   Briefcase
  The HTML graphics in this message have been blocked. [Show HTML
 Graphics - Edit Preferences]
 
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] flog me if you want to

2004-03-22 Thread David Eduardo Gomez Noguera
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 13:58, Joseph Pesco wrote:
 hi,
 The security warnings are the real? And, what is a rar file.  
 I've been out of the loop for a while :)

a rar file is (yet another) compression format.
I listed its contents with rar -l, and it ontains an ms-dos exe file, so
I would ignore it, except for the fact that I would delete it first :-D
... well, I did anyway...


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Xconfigurator help

2004-03-22 Thread Alan Pike
Pieter:
This seems to be exactly my problem. A few minutes tinkering with the config 
file and using your email as a guide helped out tremendously. Now for some 
reason I have to 'startx' at login and have lost my usual gnome login 
screen.

thanks a bunch.
cheers
--ap

From: Pieter Hulshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [XFree86] Xconfigurator help
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:17:46 +0100
On Monday 22 March 2004 20:52, Alan Pike wrote:
 (EE) ATI(0): No Display subsection in Screen section Screen0 for
 depth/fbbpp 8/8
Looks like you deleted part of your Screen section (the Display subsection 
to
be precise).
_
All the action. All the drama. Get NCAA hoops coverage at MSN Sports by 
ESPN. http://msn.espn.go.com/index.html?partnersite=espn

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Xconfigurator help

2004-03-22 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:38:53PM -0500, Alan Pike wrote:
 This seems to be exactly my problem. A few minutes tinkering with the config 
 file and using your email as a guide helped out tremendously. Now for some 
 reason I have to 'startx' at login and have lost my usual gnome login 
 screen.

I'm betting you (or your init) switched your current runlevel (or your
initdefault) from 5 to 3.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100
The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think
Tampa Bay, Floridahttp://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274

They had engineers in my day, too.  -- Perry Vance Nelson
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Xconfigurator help

2004-03-22 Thread Pieter Hulshoff
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 03:59, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:38:53PM -0500, Alan Pike wrote:
  This seems to be exactly my problem. A few minutes tinkering with the
  config file and using your email as a guide helped out tremendously. Now
  for some reason I have to 'startx' at login and have lost my usual gnome
  login screen.

 I'm betting you (or your init) switched your current runlevel (or your
 initdefault) from 5 to 3.

Sounds like a plausible explanation. Alan, you might want to take a look 
at /etc/inittab, and look at a line like this:
id:5:initdefault:
You'll want the default to be 5 (like it is in the line above) i.s.o. 3.

Regards,

Pieter Hulshoff
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] XVideo fails on 845G @ 1600x1200 (XF86 4.4.0)

2004-03-22 Thread Bjorn Solberg
I'm running RedHat 9 on a Dell Dimension 2400 with an Intel 845G chipset.
I installed XFree 4.4.0 which took care of getting the refresh rate up to
85Hz.  However, the log file says upon startup:

[...]
(--) PCI:*(0:2:0) Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [Brookdale-G] Chipset Integrated Graphics 
Device rev 1, Mem @ 0xf000/27, 0xfeb8/19
[...]
(II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:02:0
(--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
(--) Chipset 845G found
[...]
(II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r)845G/845GL/845GE/845GV Graphics Controller
(II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0
(II) I810(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 845G
(--) I810(0): Chipset: 845G
[...]
(==) I810(0): Silken mouse enabled
(II) I810(0): Initializing HW Cursor
(**) Option dpms
(**) I810(0): DPMS enabled
(WW) I810(0): Disabling XVideo output because the mode pixel rate (164 MHz)
exceeds the hardware limit (120 MHz)
(II) I810(0): X context handle = 0x0001
[...]

Reducing the resolution to 1280x1024 made XVideo work.  I tried setting
the DacSpeed parameter in XF86Config but that didn't work.  I thought the
845G would be capable of that, as I have an old Matrox G400 that can do
XVideo at that resolution with no problem.  So this leads to a couple of
questions:

1) Is this a limit in the driver, or can the 845G really not handle
   XVideo at 1600x1200?  (Windows XP seems to handle it just fine,
   though.)  If not a physical limit, how can I make the driver handle
   it, unless a driver update is needed?

2) If 1600x1200 really is too much for the 845G, is there any way that
   XVideo be re-enabled (without restarting the X server) after
   dynamically changing the resolution (Ctr-Alt-+/-)?

I appreciate any pointers and help.

Thanks,

Bjorn.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] (no subject)

2004-03-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All
After inatalling The new kernel 2.6 I get X error.
Fail to initialize core pointer? I have changed the
Xconfig file around several times with results ranging
from null to disastreous. I have a standard kbd and a
logitech usb trackball using an adapter to the PS2 port.
Also getting some usb errors but I think the pointer is
the fatal one. Does the default configuration really need
two sections for two mice? Some one please have a look at
the following and mabey the attachment and tell me where
I might look to get this fixed (2.6 kernel runs but no GUI)

From XF86Config

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse0
Driver  mouse
Option  Protocol IMPS/2
Option  Device /dev/psaux
Option  ZAxisMapping 4 5
Option  Emulate3Buttons no
EndSection

Section InputDevice
# If the normal CorePointer mouse is not a USB mouse then
# this input device can be used in AlwaysCore mode to let you
# also use USB mice at the same time.
Identifier  DevInputMice
Driver  mouse
Option  Protocol IMPS/2
Option  Device /dev/input/mice
Option  ZAxisMapping 4 5
Option  Emulate3Buttons no
EndSection

No reasonable offer refused
Thanks in advance for any hints.
Gary Fazenbaker


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] X86 Configuration Problems

2004-03-22 Thread orangutan
I know this is well documented and I've read through alot of the
documentation pertaining to this installation, but I still can't seem to
get it to work.

I'm trying to install my Nvidia driver and after I modify my x86 file
and install it all I get is a white flash (I'm assuming this is the
Nvidia splash screen) and then my monitor goes blank.

I'm using Mandrake 9.2 kernel version 2.4.22. I've got the 4.3.0 version
of X86 installed. I'm using a Nvidia FX Geforce 5200 video card. I'm
running Mandrake on a Toshiba Satellite P25-S507 laptop. 

Here's my lspci listing

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P Processor to I/O Controller
(rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P Processor to AGP Controller
(rev 02)00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB (rev 02)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB USB2 (rev 02)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev c2)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB LPC Interface Controller (rev
02)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB Ultra ATA Storage Controller
(rev 02)00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB SMBus Controller (rev 02)
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB AC'97 Audio
Controller (rev 02)
00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801EB AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device
0324 (rev a1)
02:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB21
IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link)
02:01.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Unknown device 168c:0012 (rev 01)
02:04.0 CardBus bridge: Toshiba America Info Systems ToPIC95 PCI to
Cardbus Bridge with ZV Support (rev 32)
02:04.1 CardBus bridge: Toshiba America Info Systems ToPIC95 PCI to
Cardbus Bridge with ZV Support (rev 32)
02:06.0 System peripheral: Toshiba America Info Systems SD TypA
Controller (rev 03)

Here's my X86 file


# File generated by XFdrake.

# **
# Refer to the XF86Config man page for details about the format of
# this file.
# **

Section Files
# Multiple FontPath entries are allowed (they are concatenated together)
# By default, Mandrake 6.0 and later now use a font server independent
of
# the X server to render fonts.
FontPath unix/:-1
EndSection

Section ServerFlags
AllowMouseOpenFail # allows the server to start up even if the mouse
doesn't work
#DontZoom # disable CrtlAltKP_+/KP_- (resolution switching)
#DontZap # disable CrtlAltBS (server abort)
EndSection

Section Module
Load dbe # Double-Buffering Extension
Load v4l # Video for Linux
Load extmod
Load type1
Load freetype
Load glx # 3D layer
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier Keyboard1
Driver Keyboard
Option XkbModel pc105
Option XkbLayout en_US
Option XkbOptions 
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier Mouse1
Driver mouse
Option Protocol IMPS/2
Option Device /dev/usbmouse
Option ZAxisMapping 4 5
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier monitor1
VendorName Generic
ModelName Flat Panel 1024x768
HorizSync 31.5-48.5
VertRefresh 40-70

# Sony Vaio C1(X,XS,VE,VN)?
# 1024x480 @ 85.6 Hz, 48 kHz hsync
ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 -hsync
-vsync

# TV fullscreen mode or DVD fullscreen output.
# 768x576 @ 79 Hz, 50 kHz hsync
ModeLine 768x576 50.00 768 832 846 1000 576 590 595 630

# 768x576 @ 100 Hz, 61.6 kHz hsync
ModeLine 768x576 63.07 768 800 960 1024 576 578 590 616
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier device1
Driver nvidia
Option DPMS
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier screen1
Device device1
Monitor monitor1
DefaultColorDepth 24

Subsection Display
Depth 8
Virtual 1024 768
EndSubsection

Subsection Display
Depth 15
Virtual 1024 768
EndSubsection

Subsection Display
Depth 16
Virtual 1024 768
EndSubsection

Subsection Display
Depth 24
Virtual 1024 768
EndSubsection
EndSection

Section ServerLayout
Identifier layout1
Screen screen1
InputDevice Keyboard1 CoreKeyboard
InputDevice Mouse1 CorePointer
EndSection

I can't figure it out, everything seems to be in order from what I've
read documentation wise. I don't know if it's because of the size of the
monitor on this laptop or what?

Any help will be greatly appreciated. Oh, please go easy on me I'm still
learning. Thanks


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] how to get socket ID for a window? (Window ID=Process ID)

2004-03-22 Thread dave giffin
no, xkill seems to send a destroy or kill event to the
window.

is there a way to find out which socket a window comes
from? (Window ID= Socket ID)

--- Lieven Buts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sunday 21 March 2004 10:00, dave giffin wrote:
  I would like to know how to find out which linux
  process created a window (for this, I'm only
  interested in local processes, not a networked
  environment).
 
 Isn't this what xkill does? If so, the answer
 should be in its source.
 
 -- 
 Lieven Buts
 Department of Ultrastructure
 Vrije Universiteit Brussel
 ___
 XFree86 mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] XF 4.4.0 and RH9.0

2004-03-22 Thread Alan Coopersmith
T. Horsnell (tsh) wrote:
I'm still trying to discover from this list how to compile
4.4.0 without IPv6 support. So far, so bad... :(
You should just have to add a line like this to xc/config/cf/host.def:
#define BuildIPv6NO
--
-Alan Coopersmith-   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86