Not advocating change, just criticizing something that essentially
creates unnecessary traffic, like your criticism?
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 12:30 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:33:10AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
As such, it is extremely pointless to demand that a
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
category. Munging the RT violates the Principle of Least Astonishment rather
thoroughly, so even if it's a miswart, it's still worthy to be pointed out.
Personally, not that it matters at all in any way, but I prefer
lists that do Reply-to pointing
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:33:10AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
The bare fact is, that reply-to munging flamewar threads have
occured on mailing lists since the first days that reply-to
munging started happening. I must have been on at least 200 if
not 500 mailing lists which have had this
3 matches
Mail list logo
