Re: XFree86 Bugzilla ...

2004-04-16 Thread David Dawes
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 05:33:48PM -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: Hi team, I'm not so sure about the proper patching etiquette so I'll ask here, I seem to have rights to do whatever I want with a bug, so I filed the bug, I fixed the bug (not in bugzilla), attatched a proposed patch,

XFree86 Bugzilla ...

2004-04-14 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
Hi team, I'm not so sure about the proper patching etiquette so I'll ask here, I seem to have rights to do whatever I want with a bug, so I filed the bug, I fixed the bug (not in bugzilla), attatched a proposed patch, assigned the bug to myself; but I dont think I should be able to mark it

Re: [XFree86] bugzilla

2003-04-12 Thread Kevin Brosius
Lionel Lecoq wrote: Hi, going back to a topic already discussed by the experts on this list I would like to bring in the comments of a newbie... I am now confronted with 100 e-mails per day and having a relatively modest mailbox must start considering unsubscribing :-( I had

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Jos Fonseca
as the default owner for DRI bugs. Also, what's the general mailing list one can subscribe to receive notifications everytime a bug is open? José Fonseca On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 12:07:56PM +, José Fonseca wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:04:22PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: An XFree86 bugzilla is now

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT system)

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2003-03-21 at 21:07, José Fonseca wrote: No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same

Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-19 Thread Hedblom
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:04:22 -0500 David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An XFree86 bugzilla is now available at http://bugs.xfree86.org/. Many thanks to Hewlett-Packard for supplying the hardware, netSweng for hosting, and the many developers who helped configure and test it. This is a very

Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-19 Thread Mike A. Harris
on the dri-devel list which has an account on XFree86 Bugzilla can reply and that comment is added to the bug database. Click on the URL in the bugzilla email, the bug comes up, and you can enter a comment directly into bugzilla. Even pine can do this easily. -- Mike A. Harris ftp

XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-18 Thread David Dawes
An XFree86 bugzilla is now available at http://bugs.xfree86.org/. Many thanks to Hewlett-Packard for supplying the hardware, netSweng for hosting, and the many developers who helped configure and test it. Enjoy. David -- David Dawes Release Engineer/President The XFree86

[I18n] XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-18 Thread David Dawes
An XFree86 bugzilla is now available at http://bugs.xfree86.org/. Many thanks to Hewlett-Packard for supplying the hardware, netSweng for hosting, and the many developers who helped configure and test it. Enjoy. David -- David Dawes Release Engineer/President The XFree86

[XFree86] XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-18 Thread David Dawes
An XFree86 bugzilla is now available at http://bugs.xfree86.org/. Many thanks to Hewlett-Packard for supplying the hardware, netSweng for hosting, and the many developers who helped configure and test it. Enjoy. David -- David Dawes Release Engineer/President The XFree86

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

2002-10-23 Thread Andrew P. Lentvorski
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, David Dawes wrote: This comes up from time to time. The bottom line is that having an XFree86 bug tracking system is of limited use unless the XFree86 developers use it. Since that's the group that it would impact the most, that's where the motivation for it should come

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

2002-10-23 Thread David Dawes
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:26:59PM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, David Dawes wrote: This comes up from time to time. The bottom line is that having an XFree86 bug tracking system is of limited use unless the XFree86 developers use it. Since that's the group that it

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

2002-10-22 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le mar 22/10/2002 à 00:30, David Dawes a écrit : On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote: Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache,

[Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

2002-10-21 Thread Erik Moeller
Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache, AbiWord, Red Hat Linux, Conectiva Linux, Gentoo Linux, Ximian, and many many others. XFree86, which is fundamental to

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

2002-10-21 Thread kwall
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote: Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache, AbiWord, Red Hat Linux, Conectiva Linux, Gentoo

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

2002-10-21 Thread David Dawes
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote: Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache, AbiWord, Red Hat Linux, Conectiva Linux, Gentoo Linux,