Re: [xHarbour-developers] C compiler alignment

2015-10-08 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 08/10/2015 17:05, Luis Krause Mantilla ha scritto: > Enrico: > > Yes, I think you should. Ok, thank you. I'm going to change my alignment immediately. EMG -- EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it The EMG Music page: http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Pag

Re: [xHarbour-developers] C compiler alignment

2015-10-08 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
Enrico: Yes, I think you should. On 07-10-2015 15:27, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote: > > > Il 08/10/2015 00:16, Luis Krause Mantilla ha scritto: > >>> can someone confirm that I have to use alignment 8? I ever used >>> alignment 4 but now I found that hb_pcount() returns 64 with >>> alignment 4 (wh

Re: [xHarbour-developers] C compiler alignment

2015-10-07 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 08/10/2015 00:16, Luis Krause Mantilla ha scritto: >> can someone confirm that I have to use alignment 8? I ever used >> alignment 4 but now I found that hb_pcount() returns 64 with >> alignment 4 (while it works fine with alignment 8). > > typing bcc32 -h > > -axxx Set data alignment bound

Re: [xHarbour-developers] C compiler alignment

2015-10-07 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
Enrico: typing bcc32 -h -axxx Set data alignment boundary. Default is -a8; -a- means -a1 This is with Borland 5.8 so alignment seems to default to 8 anyway. Wonder if you're using an older version of Borland in which you would have to specify -a8 to ensure it uses 8 byte alignment. Regard