Il 27/04/2016 00:22, Przemyslaw Czerpak ha scritto:
> I can help in this process but only if other xHarbour developers
> agree with this idea and can help at least reporting differences.
I personally don't agree. Current xHarbour is rock solid for me and I
don't want to take the risk and suppo
Hello,
> So my final question is:
> Are you interesting in taking current Harbour code and adding
> xHarbour extensions which were not ported to Harbour core code
> and you think are important just to keep base code for both
> compilers as close as possible. In practice it would mean also
> that w
Il 27/04/2016 11:09, Patrick Mast ha scritto:
> Enrico, we can do this in a different branche, so we still have current code
> to work with as "stable", and new branch as "non stable" until that one gets
> stable.
>
> I'm all in favour of winning speed.
Ok.
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: ht
3 matches
Mail list logo
