Validation Issues

2002-01-16 Thread Murray Altheim
[I think it's only right that we sub-thread this conversation.] "Timothy M. Dean" wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Timothy M. Dean" wrote: > > > > > Perhaps I'm not understanding what you've explained, but it > > seems that you're confusing client and serve

RE: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Timothy M. Dean
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Timothy M. Dean" wrote: > > > Perhaps I'm not understanding what you've explained, but it > seems that you're confusing client and server. Xindice is not > a client, it's a database server. No, I fully understand that Xindice is a ser

Re: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Murray Altheim
"Timothy M. Dean" wrote: > > Murray, > > Thanks for the more detailed response. Below are a couple of follow-up > questions: > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > My point (which > > I'm guessing was not expressed very clearly) is that any > > Xindice-based applica

RE: [PATCH] XIndice namespace mapping enhancements

2002-01-16 Thread Timothy M. Dean
I just ran through the tests I've been using to check namespace access, and everything works as expected. Thanks for committing my changes. - Tim > -Original Message- > From: Kimbro Staken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Su

Re: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Mathias Neumueller
Tom Bradford wrote: > > > Large Documents and Document Versioning > > Xindice needs to be capable of supporting massive documents in a > scalable fashion and with acceptable performance. Currently, the > document representation architect

RE: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Mike Mortensen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Murray Altheim Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Future of Xindice In response to Mike Mortensen and Timothy M. Dean, I'll try to reiterate that I'm not against valida

RE: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Timothy M. Dean
Murray, Thanks for the more detailed response. Below are a couple of follow-up questions: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My point (which > I'm guessing was not expressed very clearly) is that any > Xindice-based application *must* have an XML parser > available, a

RE: Joining the effort

2002-01-16 Thread Russ Reeves
Hi Fred, Count me in. I'll be happy to do the UML design docs. I'm using ArgoUML unless someone knows of a better open source design tool. I haven't used xindice yet but I'm working on a project that needs it. I should be installing and rolling it in this week. Russ From: "Frederick R. Brock" <

cvs commit: xml-xindice/docs AUTHORS

2002-01-16 Thread kstaken
kstaken 02/01/16 05:22:13 Modified:docs AUTHORS Log: Adding Timothy Dean to contributers Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -0 xml-xindice/docs/AUTHORS Index: AUTHORS === RCS file: /home/cvs/

Re: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Murray Altheim
Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote: > > Murray Altheim wrote: > > > I'm likely to be tackling something akin to this in the next few months, > > trying to hook up javacvs (the netbeans.org version, not the sourceforge > > one which is under GPL) to Xindice. I don't have much of a need for large > > documen

Re: Possible Features

2002-01-16 Thread Kimbro Staken
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 05:36 PM, Chad La Joie wrote: I agree, such functionality would be nice. I thought I might start taking a look into what was started with security so far and maybe do some work on it. Is there anyone actively working on/in charge of this section? Here are my t

Re: Possible Features

2002-01-16 Thread Lars Martin
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:52:58 -0700 Kimbro Staken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 11:50 AM, Niels Peter Strandberg wrote: > > > I see in the source code that you are working on user/group security and > > read and write access. One powerful feature would be to ad

Re: Possible Features

2002-01-16 Thread Kimbro Staken
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 11:50 AM, Niels Peter Strandberg wrote: I see in the source code that you are working on user/group security and read and write access. One powerful feature would be to add xpath based security. By allowing a user or group read/write access to a specific xpath i

Re: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Murray Altheim wrote: > I'm likely to be tackling something akin to this in the next few months, > trying to hook up javacvs (the netbeans.org version, not the sourceforge > one which is under GPL) to Xindice. I don't have much of a need for large > document support, but the approach I'd take wo

Re: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Murray Altheim
In response to Mike Mortensen and Timothy M. Dean, I'll try to reiterate that I'm not against validation features being available in applications that use Xindice as a data store. I'm against those features being embedded in Xindice itself. I guess where there seems to be some confusion is what "e

Re: Invalid Page Type

2002-01-16 Thread gcasper
gianugo schrieb: > Actually, while we are at it, I have to mention collection corruption on > Solaris 8 (I'm wondering if it's my machine being doomed... :)). In > particular the error I get is "index corrupted", mostly on empty > collections. No it's not your machine. With the current cvs all

Re: [PATCH] XIndice namespace mapping enhancements

2002-01-16 Thread Kimbro Staken
Thanks, looks good after some light regression testing. You should probably verify the new functions made it in correctly. On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 09:37 PM, Timothy M. Dean wrote: I've temporarily copied the patch file to a place where it can be accessed via the web: You should be able t

cvs commit: xml-xindice/java/src/org/apache/xindice/xml NamespaceMap.java

2002-01-16 Thread kstaken
kstaken 02/01/16 01:48:39 Modified:java/src/org/apache/xindice/client/corba CollectionServant.java java/src/org/apache/xindice/client/xmldb/services XUpdateQueryServiceImpl.java java/src/org/apache/xindice/core

[PATCH] fix for NodeListImpl.item() exception

2002-01-16 Thread Mike Gratton
Hi guys, Attached is a small patch to stop NodeListImpl.item() throwing an IndexOutOfBoundsException when the given index < 0 or >= getLength(). It now returns null to comply with the DOM. Can someone commit it to the tree? Cheers, Mike. -- Mike Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Every motive escalate

Re: [PATCH] XIndice namespace mapping enhancements

2002-01-16 Thread Timothy M. Dean
I've temporarily copied the patch file to a place where it can be accessed via the web: You should be able to get it at: http://www.visi.com/~tdean/patchfile.txt. If that doesn't work, let me know and I will email you a GZIP'd version. (not sure if this email list accepts attachments or not!) - T

Re: [PATCH] XIndice namespace mapping enhancements

2002-01-16 Thread Timothy M. Dean
I've temporarily copied the patch file to a place where it can be accessed via the web: You should be able to get it at: http://www.visi.com/~tdean/patchfile.txt. If that doesn't work, I'm also attaching a gzipped version to this email. Hope that it works this time: Let me know if not and we'll wor

RE: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Timothy M. Dean
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Murray Altheim > > Schema support > > --- > > We need to support schemas in an abstracted fashion. If we can > > architect a content model API that would allow the system to validate > >

RE: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Mike Mortensen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Murray Altheim Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:36 PM To: xindice-users@xml.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Future of Xindice Tom Bradford wrote: [...] > There are a few of things that need to be

Re: Future of Xindice

2002-01-16 Thread Dare Obasanjo
- Original Message - From: "Murray Altheim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:36 PM Subject: Re: Future of Xindice > Tom Bradford wrote: > [...] > > Schema support > > --- > > We need to support schemas in an abstracted

Re: Possible Features

2002-01-16 Thread Chad La Joie
I agree, such functionality would be nice. I thought I might start taking a look into what was started with security so far and maybe do some work on it. Is there anyone actively working on/in charge of this section? Here are my thoughts so far on the security. 1. Support of user authentica