Esteban Chiner wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to insert documents in a collection using an automatic new
ID. I use the CreateNewOID XML-RPC method and I get a huge hexadecimal
number but I would like to have an autoincremental ID value (like 1, 2,
3, etc.).
Is this possible with Xindice? Any workaround?
shane nuessler wrote:
Hi Murray,
I'm sure your advice is correct, but I just can't get it to ignore the
comments. We;ve even gone back to Xindice 1.0 now because we couldn't
get the methods working with 1.1 for RPC calls via Perl and VB. I'm
really stuck, but will keep fighting it tomorrow I thi
Hello,
I'm trying to insert documents in a collection using an automatic new
ID. I use the CreateNewOID XML-RPC method and I get a huge hexadecimal
number but I would like to have an autoincremental ID value (like 1, 2,
3, etc.).
Is this possible with Xindice? Any workaround?
Thank you very much,
We;ve even gone back to Xindice 1.0 now because we couldn't get the
methods working with 1.1 for RPC calls via Perl and VB. I'm really
stuck, but will keep fighting it tomorrow I think.
I can't say if these interfaces work as they are not a part of the main
distribution and the wire protocol cha
Hi Murray,
I'm sure your advice is correct, but I just can't get it to ignore the
comments. We;ve even gone back to Xindice 1.0 now because we couldn't
get the methods working with 1.1 for RPC calls via Perl and VB. I'm
really stuck, but will keep fighting it tomorrow I think.
Shane.
Murray Alt
After running some tests there are some corrections I should make to my
initial propositions.
The xpath expression boolean(//[EMAIL PROTECTED]'1']) could be used for this.
Again xindice doesn't support none element results at present. I've
added a bug report and unit tests for this example thou
Hi ,
I tried the delete method shown in the guide.
however I am getting an XML DB exception while deleting.
is there any other manner of deleting?
I have attched my code below:
Rupali
my code:-
--
Collection col =
DatabaseManager.getCollection("xmldb:xindice://localhost:8080/db/G
I think it would be a big decision on behalf of the project to the xml-
rpc wire protocol for direct useage as it is likely to change in
response to bugs and other improvements. Having said that I've gone
through each of the scenarios and added notes on how they can be
achieved using the current
[cc: Thierry Michel]
Murray Altheim wrote:
shane nuessler wrote:
Hi Kevin, Murry.
Thankyou very much for your help.
We are currently trying to store SMIL files for a project we are
undertaking at the moment. The SMIL file has the DTD specified at the
top to declare that SMIL version 2 is being us
shane nuessler wrote:
Hi Kevin, Murry.
Thankyou very much for your help.
We are currently trying to store SMIL files for a project we are
undertaking at the moment. The SMIL file has the DTD specified at the
top to declare that SMIL version 2 is being used. But when we store and
then retrieve th
10 matches
Mail list logo