Is the list down???
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 9/26/2003
Tested on: 9/29/2003 7:51:05 AM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message
Nick Marino wrote:
Is the list down???
I guess not ;-)
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Nick Marino wrote:
Is the list down???
I guess not ;-)
Yes, sadly it is. Hope today will come back, otherwise I'll change
registrar.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
Davide,
I am curious about something, what happens in I have a filter that returns
error codes that are negative? For example -1 or -5?
I believe it depends on the OS. Try it ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Henri van riel wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile XMail 1.17 for my uClibc system but I get
compilation errors I have not been able to solve, could somebody point
me in the right direction? These are the errors I get:
(everything fine so far, then:)
g++
hi davide,
once again a bug or feature question. i noticed that xmail tries to send a
message again if the remote server gives the error 'Mailbox full'. Is that
right? I think XMail schon bounce that message immediately back to the
sender?!
--
Soenke.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
hi davide,
once again a bug or feature question. i noticed that xmail tries to send =
a
message again if the remote server gives the error 'Mailbox full'. Is tha=
t
right? I think XMail schon bounce that message immediately back to
What changed?
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Xmail Administrator 0.24 released
A few updates to Xmail Administrator
see:
Ok,
I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I
thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:
a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow
existing mail users from sending out messages using SMTP auth, as
long as their email
I have enabled POP logs. Is there any way to hide passwords in that log?
What about setting the correct permissions to MAIL_ROOT ?
Setting correct permissions works fine for the case you think of.
I prefer not having cleartext passwords in log files because if I'm
debugging someone's
test
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 9/26/2003
Tested on: 9/29/2003 4:42:46 PM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Davide,
Have we tried to do valgrind on xmail? If you are using something
similar, please do inform the same.
Regards,
Veeresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
Davide,
Have we tried to do valgrind on xmail? If you are using something
similar, please do inform the same.
No I did not.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
I have (on windows) and it seems XMail drops the message and does not notify
anyone. Is that expected behavior?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
I have (on windows) and it seems XMail drops the message and does not notify
anyone. Is that expected behavior?
So, here's the rule. Do not return neg values.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the
No problem :) but you missed the point, why is XMail doing that for
negative values? I would expect it to ignore anything except what in the
docs, right?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, September 29,
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Nick Marino wrote:
Is the list down???
I guess not ;-)
Yes, sadly it is. Hope today will come back, otherwise I'll change
registrar.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
No problem :) but you missed the point, why is XMail doing that for
negative values? I would expect it to ignore anything except what in the
docs, right?
XMail does bit-and the number to unmask certain bits, that's why this
result.
- Davide
-
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Sasa Stupar wrote:
No it is not down. 8-)
I'm currently running with a crappy configuration to cope with the
registrar policy/dumbness.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
It's a temporary error not a permanent error, the person at the other
end might empty the mailbox at any time and then the message could go
through.
Bill
--
From: S=F6nke Ruempler[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:45 PM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Bill Healy wrote:
It's a temporary error not a permanent error, the person at the other
end might empty the mailbox at any time and then the message could go
through.
Well, the RFC suggest to return an 552 error code in such case, and this
is what XMail returns right
I had a feeling that it was not debugged through valgrind. I will
suggest that we can go ahead with valgrinding xmail. The immediate
benefit I see is to have xmail flawless (If any exist there), as well as
there would be considerable increase in performance.
Regards,
Veeresh
Davide Libenzi
Hi!
I just have noticed that nobody is looking the messages thru news
server. I have find one user to post directly but still didn't receive
any answer.
Does anyone check news server ?
Sasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Toby Reiter wrote:
Ok,
I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I
thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:
a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow
existing mail users from sending out messages
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Tracy wrote:
Greetings,
I've been looking over the problem of RFC compliance for postmaster@,
abuse@ and a couple of other aliases, and I'm wondering if there's an
existing configuration option that can be used to allow mail - even from
addresses in spammers.tab and
25 matches
Mail list logo
