[xmail] AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Harald Schneider
Many problems with older glibc compiled apps (or multi-threaded apps) on = RedHat9 can be solved with exporting the environment variable LD_ASSUME_KERNEL =3D 2.4.1 before starting the application. Just put it in your XMail startup = script and restart. Would be interesting to see, if XMail

[xmail] AW: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Harald Schneider
Please strip all '3D' characters from my previous mail. They seem to be = generated by the list gateway ... -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Harald Schneider Gesendet: Montag, 12. Januar 2004 09:07 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Pascal de R.
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 09:07:01, you said : Harald Many problems with older glibc compiled apps (or multi-threaded apps) on = Harald RedHat9 Harald can be solved with exporting the environment variable Harald LD_ASSUME_KERNEL =3D 2.4.1 I will try but do I have to write my kernel version

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Pascal de R.
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 09:31:11, you said : Harald Exactly 2.4.1 .. this makes the system to emulate the older threading = Harald scheme. thank you, it's running from now...let's see! Best regards, Pascal, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

[xmail] AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Harald Schneider
Did you install it from the rpm or have you compiles it on your system? The latter one is recommended. -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Pascal de R. Gesendet: Montag, 12. Januar 2004 15:34 An: Harald Schneider Betreff:

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Pascal de R.
Compile 1.18 with -static option as suggested by Davide. I did test with version compile on RH8 ( sent by david ) and 1.17 lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 15:50:50, you said : Harald Did you install it from the rpm or have you compiles it on your system? Harald The latter one is recommended.

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Bill Healy
I think for the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to make a difference you have to use the version compiled on RH9 with no special options like the -static. Just a guess though. Bill -- From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:34 AM To:Harald Schneider Subject:

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Pascal de R.
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 17:54:20, you said : Bill I think for the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to make a difference you have to use Bill the version compiled on RH9 with no special options like the -static. Bill Just a guess though. Thank you for your suggestion but it is not interesting because without

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Pascal de R.
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 18:02:09, you said : Pascal lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 17:54:20, you said : Bill I think for the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to make a difference you have to use Bill the version compiled on RH9 with no special options like the -static. Bill Just a guess though. Pascal Thank you

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
Pascal de R. wrote: Dear Jeffrey, lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said : Jeffrey Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM? I'm not sure to understand your suggest ? Poor choice of words, I should have said binary not kernel. You can install XMail RPM file which uses a

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Pascal de R.
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 17:54:20, you said : Bill I think for the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to make a difference you have to use Bill the version compiled on RH9 with no special options like the -static. Bill Just a guess though. So, I generated a new version without -static And I have

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Pascal de R.
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 18:21:26, you said : Jeffrey Pascal de R. wrote: Dear Jeffrey, lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said : Jeffrey Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM? I'm not sure to understand your suggest ? Jeffrey Poor choice of words, I should have said binary

[xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...

2004-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
Pascal de R. wrote: lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 18:21:26, you said : Jeffrey Pascal de R. wrote: Dear Jeffrey, lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said : Jeffrey Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM? I'm not sure to understand your suggest ? Jeffrey Poor choice of

[xmail] Re: relaying issue

2004-01-12 Thread Dale Qualls
So it has nothing to do with my server setup? Is there anything I can do to force Xmail to send the message? Thanks in advance, and great software. This beats the heck outta = eXtremail. Glad I made the jump. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/12/04 04:29PM On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Dale Qualls wrote: I'm

[xmail] Re: relaying issue

2004-01-12 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Dale Qualls wrote: So it has nothing to do with my server setup? Is there anything I can do to force Xmail to send the message? You can try to use the ESMTP extension: MAIL FROM:... I-REALLY-BEG-YOU=1 but I don't think is gonna work :-) Seriously, you can't. -

[xmail] Re: relaying issue

2004-01-12 Thread Dale Qualls
Great, thank you. I was wondering about the reverse DNS lookup that some mailservers do. If my xmailserver has a default domain of mydomain.org and a reverse DNS = lookup pointing to mydomain.org all is well. But, if myseconddomain.org = users send a message to a place that does reverse DNS

[xmail] Re: relaying issue

2004-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
Dale Qualls wrote: Great, thank you. I was wondering about the reverse DNS lookup that some mailservers do. If my xmailserver has a default domain of mydomain.org and a reverse DNS = lookup pointing to mydomain.org all is well. But, if myseconddomain.org = users send a message to a place that

[xmail] Re: relaying issue

2004-01-12 Thread Tracy
At 19:47 1/12/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote: In a standard DNS configuration you would have a domain 'zone' file for each domain name and a 'reverse lookup' zone file for each block of IPs. The zone file typically has records that resolve a name to an IP address: myhost A 12.34.56.78 The

[xmail] Re: relaying issue

2004-01-12 Thread Dale Qualls
That's exactly my question. How does an ISP handle this? I have one name = for my xmail server that if you telnet to it you get mydomain.org and a = RDNS will match mydomain.org, but if I'm sending mail from mythirddomain= ..org and a RDNS is looked at it will see mydomain.organd therefore get =